Disney’s animals-in-residence during COVID

Chicken Guy

Well-Known Member
Original Poster
A friend just mentioned to me an interesting thought while I talked with him about domesticated animals that live off of people’s food droppings in the parks (i.e. squirrels, birds). We got to thinking: how did they get along during the 3-month shutdown? I imagine they must have grown fairly dependent on park guest handouts since those, until recently, were an everyday certainty.
 

JIMINYCR

Well-Known Member
Yes animals do become dependent upon humans when they are consistently being fed. That’s why most parks and waterways have signs saying do not feed the animals. They don’t want them to lose their desire to hunt for their own food. But when a food source becomes scarce or disappears , animals tend to move on and search for better food sources. Animals are very resilient and will after a time go back to finding food themselves. The problem is that it takes time for them to readjust and relearn the hunt for food. Squirrels and birds have no problem moving off from their area to scrounge for a meal.
 

NYwdwfan

Well-Known Member
When I checked in at Skipper's Canteen 2 weeks ago the CM got all excited mid-sentence and exclaimed, "my ducks are back!". She apologized for getting sidetracked and then explained to me what when the parks were shut down the animals were relocated (she didn't elaborate on details) and this was the first she was seeing them back since the reopening.
 

MickeyLuv'r

Well-Known Member
Squirrels and birds that live off food people drop in the parks are not domesticated, they are still wild animals.

In times of less food, mice and rats will readily eat each other. Other animals like fox and coyotes also swap quickly from eating human food to hunting. Birds readily fly to new locations.

A few years back, there was an interesting episode of -I think Nature - that featured a segment on skunks. Researchers discovered that the skunks roamed far wider than anyone thought. One thing about skunks is that they are one of the species that live, I'm not sure what to call it, but they straddle different habitats. It was thought previously, some lived in woods, some lived in more open spaces, but really individuals move around multiple burrows. The skunks in the study lived both on the beach and in the woods. They had like 4 or 5 'dens,' they used and traveled over a mile each day to forage. (or maybe more? I don't recall the exact number.) So they could easily scour the beach at night, but retreat to the woods the next day.

Ducks and other birds also move around quite a bit every day. They can eat bread some of the time, but not all of the time. They can't lay eggs unless they eat enough protein, like insects and other inverts.

I think most wildlife only rely on human trash for a portion of their diet. Those that rely more exclusively on humans probably took a hit, like the tiny mites that feed off dead skin.

Ooh, I've also seen some interesting documentaries on the Chernobyl area that was abandoned. An amazing array of wildlife took over very quickly, and is thriving there. Researchers found most wildlife fared better when humans left the region. According to one article I found, "While humans are strictly prohibited from living in the Chernobyl Exclusion Zone, many other species have settled there. Brown bears, wolves, lynx, bison, deer, moose, beavers, foxes, badgers, wild boar, raccoon dogs, and more than 200 species of birds have formed their own ecosystem within the Chernobyl disaster area." https://www.mentalfloss.com/article/586059/chernobyl-animal-facts But that's just one website. What's crazy too is just how rapidly things like parking lots and playgrounds deteriorate. When plants aren't kept in check by humans, they take over rather quickly.

There were also many studies done after Mt. Saint Helens erupted. Scientists thought it would take decades for life to return, but it happened quickly. Many fish and aquatic animals survived. In one nearby lake, most fish were wiped out, but once the ash settled, the fish that have been able to breed are thriving. Like they are super healthy and grow quickly.

If the two examples above are any indication, I suspect WDW employees actually had to keep critters from moving IN while people were away.
 
Last edited:

Smiley/OCD

Well-Known Member
FWIW, I recall hearing stories (maybe here), that the feral cat population that roam the parks were being fed by the skeleton crews at WDW...
 

MickeyLuv'r

Well-Known Member
You could be thinking of the Disneyland cats.
https:///2020/04/disneyland-cats-cb1mmb/
Maybe, but we once saw a cat, that I presumed to be feral in the 7DMT area. For that matter, shortly before it opened, we saw an owl in one of the fake 7DMT trees. At first, we thought it was a really neat animatronic.
 

JohnD

Well-Known Member
Maybe, but we once saw a cat, that I presumed to be feral in the 7DMT area. For that matter, shortly before it opened, we saw an owl in one of the fake 7DMT trees. At first, we thought it was a really neat animatronic.

Owls? Sure. I live in the FL panhandle and occasionally hear them in the early morning. I also see red tailed hawks. At WDW, you'll also see bunnies everywhere.
 

AFoodie

Member
Most non-domesticated animals thrive when humans aren’t around. Humans ruin just about every environment we live in and destroy its natural ecosystems. Not pointing fingers because I’m just as guilty as anyone. Just stating a sad fact. Heavy sigh.
 

FeelsSoGoodToBeBad

Well-Known Member
My kids got SUPER excited over a squirrel at WDW and the skinks are always popular with my family. Wish those were as popular at home. I could save a FORTUNE on vacations! 🤣
 

Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.

Back
Top Bottom