CinemaSins presents: Everything Wrong with Cinderella (1950)

Bairstow

Well-Known Member
He's right about the mice.
This movie is like 80% Tom and Jerry-style filler.
It would have been better had more time been devoted to building the characters. I'm not even sure Cinderella counts as a protagonist; does she even have an arc?
 

Andrew C

You know what's funny?
He's right about the mice.
This movie is like 80% Tom and Jerry-style filler.
It would have been better had more time been devoted to building the characters. I'm not even sure Cinderella counts as a protagonist; does she even have an arc?

Hmmm. 65 years later and this is still probably the most recognizable Disney classic. At least the most recognizable Disney princess. Success then and still very popular now. Point being that I am not sure we need to have the "it would have been better if" conversation as it has stood the test of time. But to each his own.

Above clip is entertaining though.
 

Tony Perkis

Well-Known Member
Hmmm. 65 years later and this is still probably the most recognizable Disney classic. At least the most recognizable Disney princess. Success then and still very popular now. Point being that I am not sure we need to have the "it would have been better if" conversation as it has stood the test of time. But to each his own.

Above clip is entertaining though.
No one is denying that the iconic scenes and characters from the film are deserving of their reputation.

But people tend to remember the best parts and ignore the lesser elements in things they enjoy. Does anybody look at this film and think the mice are timeless characters?
 

doctornick

Well-Known Member
He's right about the mice.
This movie is like 80% Tom and Jerry-style filler.
It would have been better had more time been devoted to building the characters. I'm not even sure Cinderella counts as a protagonist; does she even have an arc?

Maybe. Even worse is Snow White -- the vast majority of the film is just signing and dancing filler with like 10-15 minutes of actual plot.
 

216bruce

Well-Known Member
Maybe. Even worse is Snow White -- the vast majority of the film is just signing and dancing filler with like 10-15 minutes of actual plot.
Agreed, but back in '37-'38 having dancing and singing in a movie was still pretty darn cool- especially animated dancing and singing. Especially feature length animated dancing and singing in color!
Really, the appeal of a lot of Disney early features is a VERY simple plot with just a few main characters fluffed out with gags and songs. It still is that way (i.e. Frozen).
Shakespeare wouldn't cut it at DFA- too many characters and his songs were lousy....
 

FettFan

Well-Known Member
Original Poster
One thing that always bugged me....when Cinderella flees from the ball, why does the King respond by sending an assassination squad made up of Hessian mercenaries?

And yes, they are Hessians. Cinderella was released a mere four months after The Adventures of Ichabod and Mr. Toad.
Headless_horseman_disney_ichabod_and_horseman_BEST.jpg
tumblr_mwtowg1XsR1r1uuc8o1_500.png

Black-clad soldiers, riding black horses who have demonic red eyes, all with red capes...and they even smash the pumpkin!
 

Matt_Black

Well-Known Member
I'm not even sure Cinderella counts as a protagonist; does she even have an arc?

I would say yes, though it's very, very subtle. At the beginning of the film, I think she's still holding out hope that her stepmother and stepsisters will accept her. You'll notice that when she makes the deal to go to the ball, she doesn't suspect any sort of loophole abuse. At the end though? She's done with it. She wants the dog to wreck Lucifer's bidniss, and she has the presence of mind to bring the other slipper just in case Lady Tremaine tries something.
 

Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.

Back
Top Bottom