Reply to thread

It's a poor analogy to bring into this conversation in general (jaws).


Replacing Jaws was about replacing a single attraction - not changing the architecture of an entire quadrant of the park and many attractions and sight lines around it.


Jaws was replaced because it was problematic to operate and long in the tooth for modern expectations.  It was grand in scale and practical elements - but like Kong was as well, seen as a reasonable sacrifice for what would replace it.


Back
Top Bottom