So I go to purchase my new Canon SD800 IS (sight unseen) and I find there are more cameras that appeal to my senses.
First, the SD800 IS is bigger than I thought it would be. Not much, but definately bigger. Now it also seems to me to be cheaper looking, plastic and didn't feel as substantial as say the SD630 (which I sort of liked the size and look of). It could be that they didn't actually have batteries in the SD800 IS but that still doesn't make it smaller.
Admittedly I am big on bright and shiny/sparkly things so of course the uber cute looking new Sony DSC T-50 jumps right out at me.
I am also swayed by the small size of the Canon SD630 and the 3 inch screen, but no IS. (Is this a good idea to lose?)
Both of these have the 3 inch screen which is very desirable to me, yet they both must trade off with no optical viewfinder. (Is this a good idea?)
The Sony has a version of the IS that was one of the "selling" points for me on the Canon SD800 IS.
Help me... I am sooooo confused!
Any thoughts on the Sony?
My criteria?
Let's see I wish to have the best product I can buy at this time covering these situations.....
* Least amount of shutter lag possible (don't want to lose precious moments)
* Larger screen size (my current is 1.5 inch)
* Rechargable battery pack
* Great photo clarity/quality
* The abliity to experiment with manual modes.
Since my initial digital was meant to take along with me easily on vacation (WDW) I'm thinking, if possible....
Night time shots
Interior attraction shots (with no flash)
Zoom and wide angle capabilities
That is for me.
***
I also need a camera for my daughter,she broke her last one, a Sony (can't remember the model), which she was quite happy with. (She is hard on electronics) I'd like to stay around the $150 price point but as low as $130 would be nice and I might be willing to go as high as $200 for the right camera.
Thank you so much for your help!
First, the SD800 IS is bigger than I thought it would be. Not much, but definately bigger. Now it also seems to me to be cheaper looking, plastic and didn't feel as substantial as say the SD630 (which I sort of liked the size and look of). It could be that they didn't actually have batteries in the SD800 IS but that still doesn't make it smaller.
Admittedly I am big on bright and shiny/sparkly things so of course the uber cute looking new Sony DSC T-50 jumps right out at me.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ba9a2/ba9a21a68dec62fad51a2b2ae35f280c4387bf57" alt="Roll Eyes :rolleyes: :rolleyes:"
I am also swayed by the small size of the Canon SD630 and the 3 inch screen, but no IS. (Is this a good idea to lose?)
Both of these have the 3 inch screen which is very desirable to me, yet they both must trade off with no optical viewfinder. (Is this a good idea?)
The Sony has a version of the IS that was one of the "selling" points for me on the Canon SD800 IS.
Help me... I am sooooo confused!
Any thoughts on the Sony?
My criteria?
Let's see I wish to have the best product I can buy at this time covering these situations.....
* Least amount of shutter lag possible (don't want to lose precious moments)
* Larger screen size (my current is 1.5 inch)
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7a5e8/7a5e80f7b48c588b184c6616a76ba94b98cadc59" alt="Frown :( :("
* Rechargable battery pack
* Great photo clarity/quality
* The abliity to experiment with manual modes.
Since my initial digital was meant to take along with me easily on vacation (WDW) I'm thinking, if possible....
Night time shots
Interior attraction shots (with no flash)
Zoom and wide angle capabilities
That is for me.
***
I also need a camera for my daughter,she broke her last one, a Sony (can't remember the model), which she was quite happy with. (She is hard on electronics) I'd like to stay around the $150 price point but as low as $130 would be nice and I might be willing to go as high as $200 for the right camera.
Thank you so much for your help!