Probably a walk through water feature.Him saying experience makes me think it won't be something major, but we shall see.
They have to plat at least 2 rides so there's something left when they cut half of it out later.How I’m imagining it is, “Come, everyone, spend your money on shoulder dragon puppets and beads! Face painting! Overpriced drinks!”
Honestly, if they removed a big chunk of Galaxy’s Edge for a smaller version of Pandora with Flight of Passage, I’d be all for this. Navi River Nap Time can remain a Florida exclusive.
Sounds like it'll replace Star Wars Launch Bay.
Subs retheme?
Nope. He said "experience", not "attraction". Bob Iger is familiar enough with the parks business to know what to call a meet n' greet or play area with a small budget, versus an actual attraction with moving ride vehicles and a big budget.
I'll bet twenty churros that Iger is talking about using this currently abandoned and forgotten big building for this "experience"...
Nope. He said "experience", not "attraction". Bob Iger is familiar enough with the parks business to know what to call a meet n' greet or play area with a small budget, versus an actual attraction with moving ride vehicles and a big budget.
I'll bet twenty churros that Iger is talking about using this currently abandoned and forgotten big building for this "experience"...
A few weeks back, Someone mentioned putting a 3D Avatar movie in the TL theatre. I can see it being something like that.
In this context, “experience” makes me think it’s something smaller which is ironic because I always describe ROTR as being an “experience” to newbies. I also like to lie to them and tell them it’s a walk thru attraction but I digress.
Experience, activation, they have all sorts of wording they like to use now. It's been made meaningless by their constant using of different terms. While they probably used Experience to ensure that it wasn't definitively read as an "attraction", it doesn't necessarily mean that it's not an attraction.Nope. He said "experience", not "attraction". Bob Iger is familiar enough with the parks business to know what to call a meet n' greet or play area with a small budget, versus an actual attraction with moving ride vehicles and a big budget.
I'll bet twenty churros that Iger is talking about using this currently abandoned and forgotten big building for this "experience"...
I'd be okay with this.
Experience, activation, they have all sorts of wording they like to use now. It's been made meaningless by their constant using of different terms. While they probably used Experience to ensure that it wasn't definitively read as an "attraction", it doesn't necessarily mean that it's not an attraction.
The Iron Man motion simulator in Hong Kong that they have in place of Star Tours is called the Iron Man Experience, after all.
I'm not saying that Avatar will replace Star Tours. Just pointing out that there are attractions called "____ Experience" now and that we cannot inherently assume that there ISN'T an attraction coming just because they used the word "Experience."That would mean Star Tours gets replaced with an Avatar simulator. But I doubt that, because that would be a bigger announcement than an aside comment on a quarterly earnings call. And it wouldn't include WDW, so that requires even more of a stretch to make it happen.
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.