Uh, I paid more for a Hilton in Anaheim than I did for Pop, and the room at Pop was WAYYY nicer. I am still so mad about that room; stuff was broken, it was incredibly dated, floor was warped...good thing I was just sleeping there.Nobody books a Disney hotel for the “value” of it…
Especially Disneyland. I love going on Jungle Cruise at night. No line and I swear the skippers lose their filters.Not a deal breaker for me. Parks are more enjoyable in the evenings anyway.
I think a lot of people here don't have a lot of experience with DL to understand why giving an extra LL is a far better idea.Pure guess on my part, but I guess not enough folks were taking advantage of EE at DLR and Disney could save costs by reducing hours and they think they think the park can handle the additional LLs?
I do not think this will happen at WDW since there are so many rooms there even if everyone does not take advantage of EE, there are still enough folks in the park using EE to justify paying CMs.
Also I do not think the parks in WDW could handle all the LLs they would have to hand out, again, because of so many rooms there.
Did you pay $300 for a Hilton across from pop?Uh, I paid more for a Hilton in Anaheim than I did for Pop, and the room at Pop was WAYYY nicer. I am still so mad about that room; stuff was broken, it was incredibly dated, floor was warped...good thing I was just sleeping there.
Although the worst one was a Hilton near Dulles Airport which ran $300 a night and I found on a third party website for cheaper. I found a SHOE in the nightstand. A. Shoe. It was the next morning otherwise I'd have been asking to move rooms.
At least I know if I'm staying at Disney, there's a certain standard or Disney will make it right. I have pretty much switched to Marriott over Hilton except for certain properties where I've had good experiences with Hilton, but even so, I've noticed a decline in quality since 2020.
Disneyland officials explained that the Early Entry program was not widely used, with many hotel guests opting for later park arrivals. That local-centric behavior, common at Disneyland, where many guests live nearby and stay offsite, likely influenced the shift.
It’s better than nothing…which is what they would like to “give”I get not thinking early entry there was worth than much, but having that for every day vs just 1 LL for your stay does not seem like an even trade
If it was 1 per day, then I could see it being a better option
Excellent points!I think a lot of people here don't have a lot of experience with DL to understand why giving an extra LL is a far better idea.
Entry is a PROCESS at DL. It's one of my major pet peeves there. No Evolv scanners; they still manually check bags. No MB tap points; they are scanning tickets and taking photos. I usually can get into a WDW park between 5-10 minutes, usually less. DL can take up to 30. So that's a lot of time wasted.
There's only three hotels. So they're opening two parks for a very limited guest set.
LLs work differently. They're basically digitized versions of original FPs. You enter, pick an attraction, and then you can get another one after two hours or when you use your LL, whichever is first. You're not doing advanced booking, a tier system, or picking three. I like this system much better, but you have to be strategic with it. Being a resort guest and getting an extra for a high demand attraction? Yeah, huge perk.
The parks also typically open at 8 am and stay open until 11 pm or midnight. For instance, today, DL is open 8 am to midnight while MK is open 9 am to 11 pm. When the entire park is open for so long, why would you need an extra 30 minutes? Especially when people generally aren't getting there early or staying late, so you can take advantage of that.
Climate is another factor I think. WDW I think a lot of people go in, go back in the afternoon for a swim or when storms roll in, nap, and come back. DL is in a desert...it can be 20 degrees cooler in the morning, and you're like, nah, I'll go out when it's warmer. Unless it's like today apparently and 90 something, but if you're in grey May, you're like "nope."
Just different there is all.
we spoke to 100% locals who weren't staying on property and not a single one of them used this perk they weren't eligible for!!! Clearly we can get rid of it!Did someone actually read this out loud before publishing the article?
The local centric behavior of people living nearby and staying offsite, likely influenced their decision to drop a benefit that only existed for hotel guests?
This I agree with.Perhaps…but it’s more about lighting lane
To be clear: lighting is revenue with no overhead…in essence.
I paid $150 for Pop, and it was clean. I really don't expect a hotel, especially an upper tier Hilton, to have a SHOE in the nightstand. I actually haven't been happy with Hilton for that reason lately. Even the Hilton Hawaiian was not up to what I'd expect for that price. I've been happier with Marriott, but I digress.Did you pay $300 for a Hilton across from pop?
Because if not…it’s a false equivalency
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.