Better than a private lounge. I'll still drink there, just could have been something meaningful.
Totally agree. The interior design is strong on motif and light on meaning. By that I mean it's a parade of aesthetic references -- patterns especially, which is superficial. Any interior design student or intern or external for-hire firm can look at Spaceship Earth and derive the patterns and aesthetic qualities, then shop for, or specify custom, tiles, carpet patterns, finishes, etc. to match. What's missing is meaning: an understanding of the purpose, ideas, intent, vision of Spaceship Earth and Epcot, starting with Walt and continuing past his death through the Imagineers that designed the park.
There was an opportunity here to reference and inform new generations of all that, to be more
knowing. And it's a perfect place to do that because it's a place to slow down, to talk, to be thoughtful and absorb.
The one thing from the images and videos that I have seen that I would have changed is the artwork in the small lounge area. It fits the style of the bar, but looks too AI-generated. Perhaps Herb Ryman concept art wouldn't have fit the aesthetic, but it would have been nice if they could have done something with that.
The artwork is also superficial. Yes it has an AI feel, and a stock-photo feel. There is so much more intriguing, meaningful, clever imagery that could have been featured that would have made people stop and say "wow." I've seen incredible, clever artwork in the stairways of cruise ships that are stunning and make me return to that part of the ship just to see it again...more was possible here.
Contemporary decor is contemporary decor.
Don't know why people are surprised to see contemporary decor in places of WDW which use contemporary decor.
Was anyone expecting a four year old girl's Disney Princess decor?
Contemporary, institutional bars are dime a dozen. Countless airport lounges, hotel bars, and contemporary restaurants are in every corner of the world. They all look roughly the same, and frankly, they all look dated after ten or fifteen years. I think a more thematic approach would have been better and had more longevity. But it doesn't need to be tacky or childish. I think they could have created a love-letter to Walt Disney's original utopian vision with a 1960s modern, tasteful interior and references to the futurism he loved. Or the late 1970s and early 80s -- when Epcot was created -- offers amazing aesthetic and thematic opportunities which could have been combined with artifacts and artwork from the creation of the park.
Both of these would have had meaning, surprise, and playfulness that this space may lack.