Ah but the question is... has the project changed!?Just to reiterate what has been said many times, this project is going ahead, and will not be cancelled.
Ah but the question is... has the project changed!?Just to reiterate what has been said many times, this project is going ahead, and will not be cancelled.
Please, not until after July. I can't take another construction wall going up before my trip with my family.That isn't far away
Most likely since nothing released so far has seemed like the final design.Ah but the question is... has the project changed!?
There hasn’t been any art that shows the back which faces Tiana’s - I’m really hoping they figure out a way to keep the Liberty Belle somehow.Here’s hoping they’re at least keeping the Liberty Belle docked.
Wouldn’t want anything to look ridiculous like a fairy tale castle at the end of Main Street USA!I don't think they're going to look like navigable waters, which would make a docked Liberty Belle look pretty ridiculous even if they could carve out space for it.
2 things - the scale of Cinderella castle is way off in my opinion - which is made worse by the tree massacare of the early 2000’s. Anaheim and Paris get the scale and design much better.The placement of the castle makes physical sense relative to Main Street and the hub even if the clash of styles is fantastical. A massive steamboat landlocked inside of a pond the same size as its hull doesn't make physical sense.
It’s not.the scale of Cinderella castle is way off in my opinion
We disagree.It’s not.
Each park was designed a specific way and Anaheim and Paris are two totally different parks.
The approach here is a much grander reveal in my opinion because of the forced perspective.
It has nothing to with some missing trees.
2 things - the scale of Cinderella castle is way off in my opinion - which is made worse by the tree massacare of the early 2000’s. Anaheim and Paris get the scale and design much better.
But back to the riverboat…. I trust that imagineers are talented enough to design something that would work for the riverboats scale. Since the “River” has always been much more narrow than the actual Mississippi- they can make it work if needed.
But it will likely get scrapped according to insiders - so best case it goes into private hands.
It’s not.
Each park was designed a specific way and Anaheim and Paris are two totally different parks.
The approach here is a much grander reveal in my opinion because of the forced perspective.
It has nothing to with some missing trees.
I think we know enough about the space constraints from the existing art to say that it would be very difficult to slot in the Liberty Belle anywhere along the existing inner circle. I don't think the Imagineers can fix that unless they decide to drastically reduce the footprint of Cars.But back to the riverboat…. I trust that imagineers are talented enough to design something that would work for the riverboats scale. Since the “River” has always been much more narrow than the actual Mississippi- they can make it work if needed.
But it will likely get scrapped according to insiders - so best case it goes into private hands.
Question. Would there be room if they axed the second attraction and the rumored store?I think we know enough about the space constraints from the existing art to say that it would be very difficult to slot in the Liberty Belle anywhere along the existing inner circle. I don't think the Imagineers can fix that unless they decide to drastically reduce the footprint of Cars.
That said, if the laydown yards outside the tracks do eventually get developed, either into an extension of Villains or an additional entrance for a hypothetical adjacent hotel, you could perhaps dock the boat elsewhere in the section of the waterway that will be retained. I'm not sure if they'd hold onto it on the off chance that they'd use it for something so far off, though.
All you're doing is making physical space for it by axing things. For it to make visual sense, you'd need to fundamentally redesign some elements. In your example, if you blew up the junior attraction, you could certainly put a puddle in its place for the Liberty Belle to sit in, but it'd still be nonsensically hemmed in by the planned landbridge to the north that connects Big Thunder to the Villains pathway.Question. Would there be room if they axed the second attraction and the rumored store?
I see what you mean.All you're doing is making physical space for it by axing things. For it to make visual sense, you'd need to fundamentally redesign some elements. In your example, if you blew up the junior attraction, you could certainly put a puddle in its place for the Liberty Belle to sit in, but it'd still be nonsensically hemmed in by the planned landbridge to the north that connects Big Thunder to the Villains pathway.
But judging having it sit in a puddle would be pathetic.Nothing is preventing the design to allow for the Liberty Belle to be docked somewhere. If that’s a desire - it can certainly happen.
We don’t know what the Tianas facing side will look like - it needs to blend into the New Orleans theme - which would include water.
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.