This is an honest question. Do DVC members actually like the lounges? As a non-DVC customer, they seem like a trivial perk.
We have used the lounge at EPCOT quite a few times, and it is a relaxing respite from the park. We don't really care about the free snacks, though we do avail ourselves of the free soft drinks.
DVC members have invested so much into the system under the impression that they would be offered a consistent and superior product. I feel like Disney takes advantage of them because they’ve already made the investment, and as such are the ones forced to actually carry the burden of cost increases when other guest can opt out and not forfeit a massive investment. Disney already has the money paid years in advance by DVC owners.
We have been DVC members for over 18 years now. The one and only thing that we were promised when we joined was to save money on our resort stays. Absolutely nothing else was promised at the time we joined, nor have we ever expected anything else. We do have APs (Sorcerer Pass) as we live only a few hours away and make day trips as well as resort trips.
So what cost increases are we carrying the burden on? Yes, our dues go up to cover the cost of running the resort, but the rack rate prices for rooms go up even more than our dues every year.
The lounges at EPCOT and MK were not paid out of our dues, so no cost for us there. What other costs are you thinking that we are burdened with?
They should be offered VERY steep discounts, free park days, etc… not a crowded lounges with free fountain sodas in my opinion - especially when the lounge takes something away that they would have otherwise been able to enjoy with the park ticket they have to pay for.
Discounts would be nice, and we do get them for shopping, food, and experiences. Would we enjoy a nice discount on our APs as has happened in the past? Sure, but it isn't anything that we are expecting as it isn't something we were promised.
As far as the MK lounge goes - please see my above response as we rarely saw anyone there using it, and we never cared to use it, so no loss at all for us. Could they have added on somewhere else and kept it? Yes, but they decided that it simply wasn't used enough to justify the cost of keeping it open and updated.