If you think it’s absolutely beautiful, and well themed, then why would you think it’s strange that WDW would want to recreate something they have had success with in Olga’s, in a park that doesn’t have that type of location at all? I don’t care about what you find strange, or where you want to drink or not. Sure it’s your opinion and you are entitled to it, but it matters just about as much as my personal opinion that roller coasters aren’t good rides. Just because I don’t like them doesn’t mean I don’t objectively understand roller coasters are popular, and that Disney would be dumb to not provide such rides that serve a big part of its customer base. I have problems with any fool and their posts that just because they don’t like something, here Alcohol, that other people shouldn’t have the right to enjoy it, and that WDW shouldn’t offer it to a customer base who clearly would use the offering
He is wrong in the sense of his inane anti-alcohol puritan diatribes. Family events from baseball games, to parks, to restaurants, to family bbqs have involved alcohol since basically the dawn of time. Every other park offers alcohol, and have a single space in all of MK that would act as a mount for people who choose to use it, doest turn MK into hedonism II.
Finally as to comparisons with Olga’s or rain Forrest, I honestly don’t see the stretch of the comparison. I am not comparing them as far as being the same food offerings, but as “family” locations where you have kids with their parents, that are “themed” more towards kids than adults (A&V they are not) and that serve alcohol. Where’s your distinction? Is it that you can order non-alcoholic drinks at their places…you can do that at B&B. Is it that there isn’t enough food offered at B&B? So if they had chicken fingers Casper wouldn’t be worried about downfall of western society due to bathtub gin and loose women?