I think a better comparison is stuff like VillainCon - it's absolute garbage. "But it's not meant to be a major attraction!" - neither is Moana, but at least Moana is very pretty. Yet Moana was ripped apart by theme park fans and they've been mostly silent on VillainCon. Or Tron, a simple but competent E-ticket, is also ripped to shreds by theme park enthusiasts. But, you know, slapping some Minion statues on things - Smart and Good.
Exactly the snark
@ToTBellHop was talking about.
Objective criticism of Universal is always dismissed or laughed at by its fans because, well, to be frank, theme park enthusiasts are largely a bunch of nerds (not saying I'm NOT a huge nerd!) who latch on to one of the two brands as part of their identity. A lot of these people (I've known tons over the course of my life so I'm not just spitballing) are the contrarian types who want to come off as more informed and more unique than the masses - thus, liking the less popular, less praised resort and bashing everything the most popular, more praised resort does falls in line with the image they want to project.
So you get things like "VillainCon fine, Tron absolute garbage". (I think Tron is an
okay E-ticket).
To circle around back to Dreamworks Land, again, it's fine that it's mediocre, but it was basically a big mud pile for over a year and it seems like they perhaps could have done a little more than paint the ground and slap some 2D character cutouts around. I'd rather people just acknowledge this than be all "Well it's okay because ______." especially when this is a park that
very much needs new
high quality additions.