I understand that. But this comes on the heels of the NYT and Barron's articles which stated Iger was steering the ship more than Chapek right now. If it's truly a vote of confidence in Chapek, then the reports of Iger's pseudo-return to power are either false or exaggerated. Or this isn't truly a vote of confidence in Chapek and could be seen as a way to make the optics look good so the stock price can rebound. Or maybe the articles on Iger are supposed to accomplish that (he is the largest single shareholder...).
In other words, to me this is as clear as mud.