Best bang for your buck on property. Love staying there and the redesign looks great.
And this would be Disney's responsibility why?Wow! Michael Graves just shot out of his grave! More pedestrian interior design of the moment from third tier interior design firms. Keep going Disney, and you’re going to end up with someplace that looks like every place.
Well, this hotel, while not Disney-owned, had creative oversight by Disney to maintain a quality Resort Hotel standard that would be in-line with other 4 star properties on-site. Very few guests know that these hotels are not "Disney" resorts, but they still should reflect the Resort's creative intent overall.And this would be Disney's responsibility why?
You make it really difficult to hold back. It seems there are two camps here: 1) Disney fans that can't stand critical thought about anything Disney and 2) Disney Fans who can look at something and differentiate between "quality" and sub-par. It seems that if the second group (myself included) point our anything negative, the first group goes on defense, blindly trying to discredit or silence anyone who points out anything "bad." I don't have a "the sky is falling" attitude at Disney World, yet. But I do see a blatant pattern of bad projects with dubious taste done by outside firms (and inside sometimes). The sky may not be falling, but don't be surprised if someday you look up and realize there's not enough sky left to remember what it once looked like.I'm pretty sure that if Disney tried to force them into keeping a particular design feature, that would be in violation of the lease agreement. "maintaining a quality Resort hotel standard" is a pretty broad area that Marriott/SPG have to work within. I'm sure Disney isn't really paying that much attention to this, which may be symptomatic of issue within TDO as a whole, but doing the Disney, sky is falling hyperbole on every topic, especially when the issue isn't one caused by Disney just makes it difficult to maintain credibility as fans when Disney does do something they need to be called out on.
You make it really difficult to hold back. It seems there are two camps here: 1) Disney fans that can't stand critical thought about anything Disney and 2) Disney Fans who can look at something and differentiate between "quality" and sub-par. It seems that if the second group (myself included) point our anything negative, the first group goes on defense, blindly trying to discredit or silence anyone who points out anything "bad." I don't have a "the sky is falling" attitude at Disney World, yet. But I do see a blatant pattern of bad projects with dubious taste done by outside firms (and inside sometimes). The sky may not be falling, but don't be surprised if someday you look up and realize there's not enough sky left to remember what it once looked like.
I disagree with you here. The main elements that made these hotels great are still there. I mentioned earlier that they are keeping the beauitful mural and swan fountiains and the addtions they are making are welcome and appropriate. The lobbies disperatly needed some updating.Well, this hotel, while not Disney-owned, had creative oversight by Disney to maintain a quality Resort Hotel standard that would be in-line with other 4 star properties on-site. Very few guests know that these hotels are not "Disney" resorts, but they still should reflect the Resort's creative intent overall.
I would actually like to know how much design oversight they have...because maybe I'm wrong.Disney has to sign off on any changes at Swolphin.
They’re also involved in the developemen of that ugly glass cube proposed to go between the two resorts.
The colors and patterns seem to be revisiting circa 1988 Kissimmee lobby design trends.As for the actual design.....I'm excited to watch the Golden Girls go to Disney special to hype the new Mary Poppins ride. I think the Dolphin re-design was much more successful.
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.