Misted Compass
Well-Known Member
3 of 4, since Berk is heavily Viking-based.It amuses me that half the lands "celestial" park leads us too are Earth/European based, with HP and Dark Universe
3 of 4, since Berk is heavily Viking-based.It amuses me that half the lands "celestial" park leads us too are Earth/European based, with HP and Dark Universe
Just a note - Operational Hourly Capacity is not ridership, which is what you are describing. OHC is the attraction's Theoretical Hourly Capacity with the typical amount of expected delays/situations/empty seats factored in. In other words, what the attraction should be able to hit within reason.
wouldn't that depend on the math behind 'theoretical'? I mean, if the formula includes a '20% of JC's FP riders visit the tiki room' as a data point one would be viewing FP as impacting OHC.
Also, I am 100% sure they're not opening the park at anything close to 100% capacity. Maybe 50-66%, tops, as a guess. And if I'm wrong I'd bet it's lower, not higher.
If only NBCUniversal had any connections with people who can creates varied scores for entertainment purposes.Another thing that sucks about Curse of the Werewolf - the music that blares from the ride track area throughout EVERY ride cycle. The same music, every time, pretty much constantly. The ride already visually hinders the land, and this music hinders it further. Plus, you can barely hear it on the ride anyway.
If only NBCUniversal had any connections with people who can creates varied scores for entertainment purposes.
Didn't they already tap Danny Elfman to score Dark Universe?If only NBCUniversal had any connections with people who can creates varied scores for entertainment purposes.
Didn't they already tap Danny Elfman to score Dark Universe?
This tribalism way of thinking is beyond tiresome and honestly detrimental to the message of what we want out of premium-priced theme parks - which should be wanting the best possible product. Handwaving caring about things that equate to high quality like good sightlines as something "only Disney die-hards care about" is some serious mental gymnastics to avoid admitting that Disney may in fact still be better at some things.
Intrusion of finished elements from one land into another can be somewhat problematic, but it's an entirely different animal from seeing unfinished or poorly disguised show buildings, backstage traffic pathways and facilities, or nearby industrial infrastructure that is not part of the park. Not sure why that's difficult to understand or why it's seen as "fussy".I find it an equally fussy argument when people complained about being able to see the spires of Galaxy's Edge from inside Toy Story Land, for example.
Attraction capacity = how many people per hour can experience it. The method they used to enter is irrelevant.
Theoretical hourly capacity = how many people could theoretically experience the attraction in a perfect situation where the max number of vehicles are online, every single seat is filled, and there are absolutely no delays, not even seconds of delay. This is close to impossible to achieve the majority of the time, so parks define...
Operational hourly capacity = as a realistic expectation of how many guests can experience the attraction per hour.
Fastpass/Lightning Lane/Express/Virtual Queue etc. do not affect capacity, they affect ridership. Ridership is how many people are actually riding the attraction, how many people are in the queue, how in demand it is based on other park factors, etc. For example, Fast & Furious Supercharged has a very high capacity, but typically low ridership. However, it's ridership increases the busier the park is as more and more guests are looking for anything to do with a shorter line.
Actual Hourly Capacity (AHC) actually comes in theoretical/assumed and observed flavors.appreciate that! I certainly have no clue how theme parks use measurements, but as someone who has crunched a lot of data, it sounds like Attraction Capacity and Theoretical Hourly Capacity are the same thing.
Personally, if I wanted to measure how the operation was doing, we would measure OHC verse a realistic model (which is what I would think a THC would be used for). If I were modeling, my THC would factor things such as 'the belt needs to be slowed 1% of the time each hour' -- just factor in the real world factors that make (your) THC unrealistic as one would need a more realistic model if one were to measure how well OHC was being achieved.
I'll in WDW during preview period and after that no clue when I may be back. Do I take a chance on the Preview period or wait for an undetermined visit in the distant future? I can fit Epic in on either May 16th or 19th. I don't need to ride everything as taking in the atmosphere will be priority but if I do ride anything it would be Monsters, Potter and at least one Nintendo ride.
Hmmm...? And which day would be best? Not sure the preview hours or how crowded it will be either.
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.