I honestly wouldn't be surprised if "Instagrammability" was a deciding factor in some of the design of the park.True That!
I honestly wouldn't be surprised if "Instagrammability" was a deciding factor in some of the design of the park.True That!
I think it definitely factored into the portals.I honestly wouldn't be surprised if "Instagrammability" was a deciding factor in some of the design of the park.
But if there are legal issues with people even talking about what's in the park, surely they simply can't start running previews for thousands of guests. That just isn't realistic in 2025 and I think any of us would have known that even without a new major park having opened in Orlando in recent decades.Theme parks have been doing that for years.
This just happens to be the first new major park in Orlando since the advent of social media and influencers.
Sure, but people who see a preview of a Broadway show can still go home and write about it on the Internet. Those involved may wish that they didn't, but there's no way to really stop them and as long as everyone knows the show is still in previews that at least gives some context.I view this as no different from previews in the theater world. No reviewers/critics, and audiences know they aren’t getting the finished/final product. I see this as Universal trying to gain knowledge from having visitors (an audience) and seeing their reactions. The same reason and goal of theatrical previews. It gives you a chance to change things that aren’t working, as well as lean into the things that are working.
Once it’s out of previews, you accept review and criticism, but during previews you are looking to learn, not broadcast.
I think they are doing a good job of managing this so far, and expect they will tweak some things over the next two months.
Worse yet, some people may even post slime tutorials — which actually violate the law!Sure, but people who see a preview of a Broadway show can still go home and write about it on the Internet. Those involved may wish that they didn't, but there's no way to really stop them and as long as everyone knows the show is still in previews that at least gives some context.
I’m curious as to how instagram-able the different sights of Epic will be for normies. I think the portals will be a miss because they’re hard to tell apart in photos and it’s kinda difficult to figure out what it is if you don’t already know.I think it definitely factored into the portals.
Yeah, I'd be surprised if the idea behind the portals was that they would be Instagram-able. For a start, wouldn't it kind of clog the walkways if loads of people were trying to take pictures in front of the fairly narrow entrances to each land?Worse yet, some people may even post slime tutorials — which actually violate the law!
I’m curious as to how instagram-able the different sights of Epic will be for normies. I think the portals will be a miss because they’re hard to tell apart in photos and it’s kinda difficult to figure out what it is if you don’t already know.
My guess is that the big Instagram sights will probably be Mount Beanpole, the Manor, the Berk reveal, the Potter reveal + queue, and maybe Burning Blade.
The more egregious example is the white Metro wall after the portal for Harry Potter. Very bizarreWas kind of surprised to see in one video they put a big rock with writing right outside the portal into Isle of Berk as I'd also think they wouldn't want people stopping there to read it, but maybe there is more space that it looked in the video.
I should clarify: what I stated earlier was speculation.But if there are legal issues with people even talking about what's in the park, surely they simply can't start running previews for thousands of guests. That just isn't realistic in 2025 and I think any of us would have known that even without a new major park having opened in Orlando in recent decades.
I understand trying to prevent pictures and videos coming out to maintain the surprise or if areas are unfinished, even though I think even that is ultimately going to get beyond them soon enough. Suggesting people can't even review the park online is just nuts, though.
If they're really also firing hundreds of people over these things, then I guess they must be pretty relaxed about staffing.
You could say this about literally any ride with animatronics. Some AAs are more vital than others, but they all hurt the experience to some degree when not working. Universal has a spotty history with the upkeep of AAs, but they've never aimed a strobe light at one and called it a day, so at least they have that going for them.After seeing some spoilers of MU, as much as it's impressive to see, I feel like it will somehow affect the ride experience when some AA are not working as intended. However, from what I've seen, the AA are mostly moving their arms and body and not really "talking" AAs like the AAs in Tiana's Bayou where it's very obvious when they break down.
^^^^^^I should clarify: what I stated earlier was speculation.
Even when it’s grounded in lived experience, speculation is still just that.
What I can say with confidence is that the Sesame Street/SeaWorld lawsuit triggered a noticeable shift across the themed entertainment industry. Licensees of third-party IP seem to be taking their contracts more seriously. It’s not that Disney or Universal were lax before - they weren’t - but there’s a renewed focus now, with some strategic hires. Unfortunately, that shift appears to be happening mostly at the salaried professional ranks, not at the ground level where it would be most actionable.
Now, if I had to speculate again: Universal has poured a massive investment into this park. From a brand management perspective, it makes sense that they'd want to own the narrative. The last thing they want is an influencer doing a full-on Marques Brownlee teardown and redefining public perception before the park has even had a chance to tell its own story.
On one hand, rushing a hotel to open before it's actually fully completed is kind of dumb, especially when that hotel doesn't even service a park that is open yet.
I had a response ready... but:On one hand, rushing a hotel to open before it's actually fully completed is kind of dumb, especially when that hotel doesn't even service a park that is open yet.
This sums it up.I honestly don't find this dumb -- with so much "new" coming; it would make sense to have some kinks ironed out for the staff & systems. It's just what to be expected when something brand new starts operations - issues & suffering from demand. That's why these places "pressure test." I don't like that the creator of the video can't simply look at it and analyze that aspect.
Why must Universal always Universal?cutting the original, non-IP characters sucks. Do they want CP to feel more like World Celebration by making it more empty?There's something on X regarding CP's Entertainment........
UOR!!!!........
Who Knows! Hopefully the Fountain Shows and UOR 's first chance at a High Level Fireworks Show are NOT Cut!!!!!Why must Universal always Universal?cutting the original, non-IP characters sucks. Do they want CP to feel more like World Celebration by making it more empty?
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.