Universal Epic Universe (South Expansion Complex) - Opens May 22 2025

sedati

Well-Known Member
Is anyone worried at all that EU won’t live up to the person hype you’ve built up over years of excitement for it?

A bit nervous about that ngl.

Happened with cosmic rewind for me
The very first concept art walked my expectations way back. Immediately gone were the rumors of a park on the scale of Epcot and the artistry of DisneySea. What we're getting is nice, but severely marred by the hotel. Certainly we're getting some great theming, but the some portals (monsters/dragon) seemed designed to deliver specific photo-ops rather than full-360 immersion.
 

rd805

Well-Known Member
I can't tell if this is sarcasm or not. Are we comparing a ticket that gets you into 4 theme parks in a day, to a ticket that gets you into a single park?
Not sarcasm at all -- sure it's great in theory to have access to 4 theme parks...but most people don't actually do that. And if you look at the number of attractions you may do from sun-up to sun-down, is it really ALL that different? You're also talking to someone who has been to every WDW theme park 20-30 visits in my lifetime vs something completely brand new.

It was just a comparison of the dollar amount on if i wanted to do 1 day at EPIC, vs say Animal Kingdom morning, end at Hollywood Studios for Fantasmic with 1 full day to do as much of those parks as possible. In theory...the value is pretty similiar and actually less expensive with EPIC.

Not being combative, but hope this clears up my thoughts.
 

TalkToEthan

Well-Known Member
Splash Mountain didn’t either......

Yes, but splash mnt is, well, a water trough ride whereas Yoshi is supposed to be experienced as a dry run(or mostly dry run anyway). I get that Yoshi is built to withstand the buckets of rain in August and the like but it’s nothing like those rapid and trough rides
 

DarkMetroid567

Well-Known Member
Not sarcasm at all -- sure it's great in theory to have access to 4 theme parks...but most people don't actually do that. And if you look at the number of attractions you may do from sun-up to sun-down, is it really ALL that different? You're also talking to someone who has been to every WDW theme park 20-30 visits in my lifetime vs something completely brand new.

It was just a comparison of the dollar amount on if i wanted to do 1 day at EPIC, vs say Animal Kingdom morning, end at Hollywood Studios for Fantasmic with 1 full day to do as much of those parks as possible. In theory...the value is pretty similiar and actually less expensive with EPIC.

Not being combative, but hope this clears up my thoughts.
It’s a fair enough take, I just think it can be cross-applied to just about any resort. I can see myself doing an IoA-EU park hop day where I do Hagrids/Veloci/Spidey, leave, and then do just Monsters/Ministry/Stardust.
 

DarkMetroid567

Well-Known Member
You’ve ripped that thing a new one, as for discussion boards go, nonstop.

Is its placement and/or architecture really that bad?? Because to me it looks passable based on pictures.
because a lightly themed hotel as a weenie is super lame. Especially when you see what Universal has done with Volcano Bay and Isla Nublar in Beijing. The hotel is… a choice.
 

Disney Analyst

Well-Known Member
Not sarcasm at all -- sure it's great in theory to have access to 4 theme parks...but most people don't actually do that. And if you look at the number of attractions you may do from sun-up to sun-down, is it really ALL that different? You're also talking to someone who has been to every WDW theme park 20-30 visits in my lifetime vs something completely brand new.

It was just a comparison of the dollar amount on if i wanted to do 1 day at EPIC, vs say Animal Kingdom morning, end at Hollywood Studios for Fantasmic with 1 full day to do as much of those parks as possible. In theory...the value is pretty similiar and actually less expensive with EPIC.

Not being combative, but hope this clears up my thoughts.

Sure, but the point is the cost of that ticket is allowing access to 4 theme parks, regardless if the guest visits all four or not.

It doesn't seem comparative to me. Now what would be a fair comparison is the price of whatever parkhopper they will release including EU.

For now, EU is comparable to a single day ticket at MK.
 

Moth

Well-Known Member
The very first concept art walked my expectations way back. Immediately gone were the rumors of a park on the scale of Epcot and the artistry of DisneySea. What we're getting is nice, but severely marred by the hotel. Certainly we're getting some great theming, but the some portals (monsters/dragon) seemed designed to deliver specific photo-ops rather than full-360 immersion.
I'm willing to argue Donkey Kong also falls into the same pitfalls slightly. It's interesting that the two Universal original lands suffer from this issue while the two that have to be licensed out have marginally better sightlines and immersion.

I'm gonna be in the park on the 20th but I can't help but feel a smidgeee disappointed if it's true they didn't put that much care into sightlines for Berk and DU, the lands that should have it the most emphasized.


I'm just going to blame Harry Potter for taking up budget/time/space again and call it a day because I don't like it /s.
 

sedati

Well-Known Member
As a huge coaster fan (farewell Rip Ride Rocket) I'm worried about reports that Stardust is rougher than Velocicoaster- a ride I was not expecting to be rattled on so much. Also some have said Donkey Kong seems to shudder after turns due to the unique ride system. Coasters don't tend to get smoother over time. The DK comments are distressing as it is basically a prototype and this may be indicative of long term problems (Do we know why Japan was delayed?)

Stardust as a coaster looks fun and a must ride though it is basically a Six-Flags attraction in execution. (Actually, Six Flags will destroy this with "Falcon's Flight")

Werewolf- should be fun, but short and covered in nets.

Mine Cart- a curiosity mostly- worth a try as it is a novel concept.

Hiccups- A fine looking family coaster with what looks like an odd 50/50 split between great theming and show elements and theme-shattering site-lines and... more nets.
 

BringMeTheHoriz

Active Member
As a huge coaster fan (farewell Rip Ride Rocket) I'm worried about reports that Stardust is rougher than Velocicoaster- a ride I was not expecting to be rattled on so much. Also some have said Donkey Kong seems to shudder after turns due to the unique ride system. Coasters don't tend to get smoother over time. The DK comments are distressing as it is basically a prototype and this may be indicative of long term problems (Do we know why Japan was delayed?)

Stardust as a coaster looks fun and a must ride though it is basically a Six-Flags attraction in execution. (Actually, Six Flags will destroy this with "Falcon's Flight")

Werewolf- should be fun, but short and covered in nets.

Mine Cart- a curiosity mostly- worth a try as it is a novel concept.

Hiccups- A fine looking family coaster with what looks like an odd 50/50 split between great theming and show elements and theme-shattering site-lines and... more nets.

Roughness is a function of wheel maintenance and for a coaster this new nothing to do with the track itself. I’ve had rough rides and smooth rides in the same day on Stardust. If you’re having a rough ride then you just got unlucky and caught a car that will probably get a wheel replacement that night. As far as it being a Six Flags attraction, even in its simplicity I can’t recall a Six Flags coaster anywhere having the level of detail you’ll see on Stardust’s trains, the crispy on-board audio they have, or the impressive interlocking and dueling elements they have. Also weird that we’re just throwing in a comparison to an oil funded pet project literally 7,402 miles from Epic, but I’m sure for all their money the Saudis have at least figured out the sightline issues for their massive coaster in a way Universal couldn’t.

All of this recent conversation, including the past 20 pages of sightline complaints, comes off as very FOTPBTAMTADPFTNSM to me (IYKYK but for the uninitiated that’s ’Fear Of This Park Being Talked About More Than Any Disney Park For The Next Six Months’). That said, I also recognize that my posts in this thread are starting to sound like I’m going off the Universal fanboi deep end, which to an extent is true. I’ll help you breathe a sigh of relief: Epic is not perfect. But Universal is taking the first multi-billion dollar theme park gamble in the U.S. in 25 years, through difficult times to boot, and that’s gotta be worth something. I’m proud to work for this company, and I’m so so appreciative that our leadership team has trusted us and given us so much time to preview this park. It’s a once in a lifetime event, and for anyone that’s had even a small sliver of involvement in getting those gates open it’s given them a strong sense of pride. Epic will be the topic of discussion for the industry this year, but eventually everything will go back to normal. Disney has been and will continue to be the standard bearer, but without Universal Disney would have no reason to improve. If you live or vacation in Central Florida you should always root for the best new parks, lands, and attractions regardless if it’s Universal, Disney, Seaworld, or Fun Spot (I jest) putting them in. It makes everyone else have to be better. Maybe that’s an argument for better sightlines after all.

And just so you don’t think I’ve lost all my marbles and snorted all the new floo powder: I prefer Velocicoaster to Stardust.
 

Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.

Back
Top Bottom