Search results

I believe some of the characters have already appeared in the parks. They just cant use the Marvel brand name in marketing.

DING! DING! DING! "While not turned on yet, the new digital movie posters in the queue are installed" The website source is blocked so I can't link it.

I only find this acceptable if they name the other parks "Daryl".

So then they'll just have Rod Serling invite you to the concert.

Given the subject matter, I think we could go as far as to say "If Lee says $1.6 Billion included Star Wars, then I think we can believe that's what he's heard." Just because Lee or even Spirit says it, it doesn't make it gospel. To me, it means I can trust that they are not lying to us about...

I saw a commercial for the new episode last night and noticed they said "world BROADCAST premiere" of the new trailer. I assumed that meant it was the same as the one on the net.

It looks like it might actually be called "Set the Bar".

The opaque glass on the tall cabinet (pic #5 and #24) make me wonder if there will be some special effect there eventually.

If I'm remembering correctly (it WAS 30 years ago), I recall seeing an entertainment news show talking about how the producers on Miami Vice were purchasing the rights to use original recordings in the show instead of the cheaper studio band re-recordings that were so prevalent at that time.

The area she is in is marked "Drawing Room". So last year, my sister-in-law thought she was waiting in line for the Animation Academy.

December 3rd, actually.

Aren't they getting ready to remove one in DHS?

Be careful what you say. The Patent office will cancel your trademarks.

I don't know why people are getting upset about this. It's just a marketing gimmick. The same way Mulan and Pocohantas aren't really princesses. They start marketing 7DMT as a "mountain" and then next they're selling t-shirts saying "I conquered the Mountains" with pictures of all the rides...

I thought people were suggesting that it could only be a mountain if it had "mountain" in the name. If you want to be technical. Expedition Everest doesn't take place on Everest. So the fact that Everest is a real mountain would be irrelevant. But you are correct. It does have Mountain in...

Expedition Everest and the Matterhorn don't have "mountain" in the title but they are still considered mountains. Or are we only using MK in this example?

What actually started the boom in Marvel films was the creation of Marvel Studios (formerly Marvel Films). The first film licensed by Marvel Studios was Blade.

That pavilion has no connection to anything right now. Wouldn't that be the point of getting a sponsor in there regardless of who they are?

I work for a company that has had a licensing deal with Marvel for about 10+ years now. Now that Disney owns Marvel, we have a cap on the number of units we can produce for any given product. Before we were allowed to produce as many as we wanted. Now we are selling out before the product...