Search results

it's more a story about the help at the resorts where they just don't care anymore.... finding a wrong towel in the bin and not caring... Or just another reddit troll... I'm going with the latter myself...

That's the secret in all of this... Disney is gonna start selling DAS eligibility insurance and make BILLIONS! People here just didn't see it coming!

And how many times do you think you would get away with that? Good Lord dude... It's called Guest Retention... they do this kind of stuff all the time, they even GIVE PEOPLE STUFF. AND NONE OF IT IS ON THE WEBSITE!

Where do you think Disney's reputation for customer service comes from... is it not believable if you can't find it on a Disney Website? Literally the company is IN this spot due to their customer service... and now you think they are magically just going to be a different company?

Because until the court rules them legal, they are actually requirements that do go against existing prescedent. And I believe it is you who brought up legality in response to the Seaseme St example.. which is a SPECIFIC context (X number at that park) not discussed before.... but yet you...

There are many angles that are in fact pretty clear with precesdent and guidelines - but there are other areas that are not. I think your issue is when you take a specific situation and jump to broad when people are talking legality. TLDR - context matters when considering if a statement is...

I think you don't understand that none of these systems are deemed illegal or legal... until they are actually tested in court. That is the foundational issue here for a requirement that is broad, non-specific, and not yet tested in the court system. This is not a matter of 'the law says this...

Or people’s standards continue to dwindle snd are willing to cheat more for lack of consequences… Same way attitudes dwindle… morals die…petty crime like package theft is a thing by all types of people… We have entire generations brought up with video fed to them constantly on how to get...

Remember when it was just Fastpass... but GAC abuse was still so bad they had to kill GAC and introduce DAS? Yeah... that's the reality... no need to try to blame Genie+... the abuse is as old as the clickbait articles and slimly people that encouraged others to lie to get an advantage.

They aren't going to make enough money to move any needles with youtube. Making $1000 off a 2 million views isn't squat to them. This is marketing... not profit.

It was called "Guest relations". Those in need would get walked in the ride exits... just like they did for VIPs, etc.

Huh? Disney has been accommodating guests with disability needs long before the ADA made it a legal requirement.

But these words out of context can be distorted too. Is "if I have to" without any consequence? Meaning... take for example the person with the handicap parking because they can't walk long distances... it doesn't only mean they can't physically do it ever, it can mean they have trouble doing...

This has been proven wrong by disney when they needed to create DAS to replace the GAC and hard data was provided in the lawsuit to back it up. And similar data has been collected by independent third parties with DAS now and has been verified by Disney (informally) as well. You can put your...

Maybe in your bizarro universe… And what your post lacks is it doesn’t matter how your family uses it nor dors it bind how others use it. Just because you have legit reasons and don’t see any advantage to it doesn’t mean the other variations don’t exist.

It’s already been covered multiple times the advantages it gains. And by having unrestricted access (vs single use for everyone else) to the high priority queue they absolutely are effecting others in that queue. This is not debatable- it’s simple math

Disneyland also has extremely small queues - and hence right from the get go can't allocate the # of slots to the high prority queue the same as a ride built with FP return in mind in the 90s onward. Compare the merge ratio of say Indy... to the merge ratio of a Fantasyland ride like Peter Pan...

"abuse" in the sense that the system was never intended to be an 'advantage' to do more in a park - simply to facilitate accommodating for people's needs. When you combine power with the absence of real constraints.. you get a situation that was never the intended outcome. You take offense...

Teens by the millions. Disney should issue high vis vests :)