Search results

That explains the responses. See page 6 ... So no, that is not routine maintenance. Disney would not have to use mitigation credits like this for routine maintenance. Direct link to Exhibit C, which has details about the wetlands and the mitigation credits.

I quoted the permit above. The permit is also for "selective" wetland clearing over a large area. "Roadside Site Modifications" is a bit deceptive. To me the name "MK Park 2 Roadside Site Modifications" means improvements for the "MK Park 2" project, which, if is not what it suggests at first...

The actual permit says it was for stormwater management: Dewatering is also mentioned. Now, if I'm reading this old post right, there have been launchers surrounded by SFWMD wetlands before 2021, so I'm not sure Disney would need the stormwater management just for the launchers. Disney is...

I don't think they have needed a 40+ acres project, releasing over 15 acres of wetlands from SFWMD, for that in the past?

https://my.sfwmd.gov/ePermitting/DetailedReport.do?applicationNo=210621-6568 From 2021.

Does anyone know what the "Park 2 Annex" building to the north of the Magic Kingdom is? I found permits for a "Park 2" project nearby that would impact a considerable amount of wetlands presumably named after this building.

It was questionable stuff, but it was new stuff, especially the guy you dislike. ;)

FWIW, another site you guys dislike heard about it in May, and a Redditor was told the show was coming recently. The show wll have as much to with mammals as the old show did with bugs, and since Rohde is back it sounds like it will have some oversight. At least the animals will have the right...

That doesn't necessarily mean they can expand east: the east is important conservation land, a vital wildlife corridor; and also the authorities are keen not to disrupt the Reedy Creek flood plain too badly. However, perhaps Disney can exchange some of the land open to development opposite...

Emphasis mine. Where did you hear that?

Don't forget about Woody: a lot of people would make the connection between a child's western story and the frontier, similar to the connection between giant Teddy bears singing country/western songs and Frontierland, but the online community often can only connect Woody to Pixar, hence comments...

How do you know that whatever happens won't also look good?

But Pecos is not becoming Tiana's Palace, per @ToTBellHop ?

Nice find. However, all I could find in that book was that the supply road could be moved to expand the park. Where in the book did you find out about expanding east?

Could you clarify what you clarified? I'm missing the rug which pulls the room of this conversation together. :(

Iger is worried that prices are getting too high, and that they are pricing out parts of their guest market. https://deadline.com/2023/03/bob-iger-says-disney-theme-parks-priced-high-brand-needs-to-be-accessible-1235283912/#! Since they are not a charity, this suggests increasing supply, which...

That's why you lower prices when you do this.

The offices are in the western plot on that map. I'm talking about the eastern plot on that map, the small part east of the road, in conservation land.

I mean the plot to the east. Outside the current park boundary. Wasn't Kali the western plot on my image?

I found a strange old post claiming there was an expansion pad in the conservation area between Animal Kingdom and Reedy Creek. No one corrected this. Here's a map. Anyone have more information as to why it was thought the eastern plot on the map was available? Was it confused with the farm...