Search results

One what? Are you all sure you're not getting rumors for Florida confused with Japan? 🤔

Pokemon was still on the table for a different part of the park when DreamWorks was greenlit, so one didn't replace the other. If you've heard any other developments, that's news to me.

DreamWorks took Nintendo's spot. Where'd you hear this?

IOA doesn't have a "centerpiece" (unless we're counting a body of water.) There's no structure that you're supposed to be able to see and have it look good from everywhere, ala Cinderella Castle. Even Hogwarts has good angles and bad angles, and from across the lagoon is not its good angle. The...

I don't like the way she phrased that. They need to get a move on.

It's Marvel Superhero Island. Universal gifted the rights to Disney so they could clear the way to build a land based on Ice Cube's War of the Worlds.

HHN guests must travel in front of the old Nickelodeon building and past the coaster to get to most of the soundstage houses this year (unless you go back the other way.) I'm no expert on coaster deconstruction, but I'd imagine that's to make sure everything stays in place and doesn't go flying.

There's a real possibility that WDW gets hit by a rogue asteroid tomorrow. Some possibilities aren't likely enough to give much thought to.

There's a wide divide between "not in very good financial shape" and "wouldn't even be around anymore." Potter being a major boon to the resort doesn't mean it saved the resort. You could argue we wouldn't have Epic Universe without it, but the first two parks? I'm not buying it. Comcast...

Yeah, I see what you're trying to do here, and it's more than a little tacky given the context you've chosen to frame it in. Universal were never in any danger of having to close the resort. SeaWorld is in much worse shape than Universal ever was and is still in operation, after literal decades...

This is... premature.

That's a bit much.

Clickbait. These review sites (and the potential act of review bombing) didn't even exist when the previous parks were opened. Epic is opening to a completely different Internet landscape, which will inevitably be reflected in all the early kneejerk reactions.

That was just contrived business speak for "No."

It's a Kuka ride. It's only omnimover-like in the sense that the vehicles are dispatched closely together in a chain that never stops moving (with the exception of the secondary loading platform for disabled guests.)

Don't give them any ideas. The preshow needs to work as intended. The entire attraction does. Even with the large amount of AAs, because of the way they're staggered between scenes, it's still painfully obvious when even just one of them isn't working.

While I'm not in favor of closing MIB, as I've already established, those two attractions aren't exactly working with the same amount of real estate. I have a feeling we'd be seeing more people complaining about another underwhelming attraction if they tried to put any sort of dark ride in...

I assume this would be some sort of interactive attraction. I think the big hangup with Ghostbusters potentially getting its own interactive attraction is the fact that MIB and Minions already exist. I've seen people wanting to replace MIB with Ghostbusters, but I think the park has more...

I got it! It's going to be the world's first bed coaster, The Exorcist: The Ride.

They said "if DisneyQuest opened today." Chicago's was the same format as Orlando's, no?