Search results

Richard Sherman was recorded before his death reading out the lyrics himself:

No. It’s a famously centre-right newspaper that almost always endorses the Conservative Party. All of this information is pretty easy to come by if you actually cared to know.

I don’t think you understand The Sunday Times or its readership. It certainly doesn’t cater to the same demographic as its New York namesake.

Either you’ve misunderstood me, or I’m misunderstanding you, because I haven’t the foggiest notion what you mean. Perhaps someone might translate?

I’m just glad Elio has nothing remotely “controversial” about it that certain posters here might point to as a reason for its failure.

I saw it today. It’s very good! Classically Pixar and full of heart. I’m not sure why the buzz before its release was so negative.

It’s difficult (and probably cruel) to get a real deer to do the washing up. There’s much the film can be criticised for, but given what the animals are expected to do, I really don’t think one can reasonably have expected them to be real.

Brian May has spoken about his initial disapproval of the lyrics, which he believed encouraged the kind of dangerous partying that Freddie Mercury was then indulging in. But yes, he didn’t divulge this until a few years ago, and the song won him around eventually. (The naughtiness is...

I suspect we’re quibbling over terminology rather than actually disagreeing with each other. “Dated” tends to have pejorative overtones, which may explain your resistance to the term. I think @BrianLo put it well by saying that the “material is timeless” even if it is clearly the product of a...

Waldo was a prominent part of the show and very much showed his age. Figment is just poorly done; having not seen the new Mermaid show (or any recordings of it), I can't speak to that particular comparison. Again, this isn't a criticism; if anything, I think it made the show more charming. And...

I'm surprised you would deny it felt dated. (That's not a bad thing, I hasten to add. It's true of many of the best attractions at Disney.)

The footage will always and unavoidably look distorted from the sides:

The second half of Wicked, which overlaps in timeline with The Wizard of Oz, is absolutely a retelling (or rather alternative telling) of it.

I take it you have better information than he does? I'm losing track of who counts as an insider here!

I’m not saying I don’t believe you; I’m asking how you know. Do you have insider knowledge?

But how do you know this? Do you know this, or are you just assuming?

I don’t understand all this scepticism. It’s not as if they’re promising us the world. Creating a new show for a preexisting theatre seems a relatively easy task to me. Now, whether it ends up being any good is another matter, but I see no reason to doubt that a show of some kind is being...

How do you know this?

I mean, sure, the approach to the villains isn't monolithic, and my previous post could have done a better job of reflecting that, but I'm surprised that anyone would expect the new Villains Land to skimp on the humour and campery, which I don't think is limited to character interactions...