Search results

Any chance they change Galaxy's Edge to make it great instead of average?

And he's absolutely right, what they've committed to spending the money ON should be scrutinized. Are you saying you want more live action remakes, animated sequels, and IP shoved into every corner of the parks? More classic attractions destroyed? More 5+ year build timelines on rides while...

Okay, the save the magic website he created. He's an investor in Disney so that meeets your requirement, and he wants them to increase spending on the parks. That was easy.

Yeah actually cutting all their garbage spending and focusing on the parks does sound pretty great.

The "evidence" is literally the website and campaign he's been running on for over a year... I'm not doing the research for you. It's there. Go read it.

So only people with perfect track records can be on the board? They would have to get rid of everyone on the board AND Bob.

You're only looking at his financial track record. Irrelevant to what's going on with him and Disney. Unless you're main concern is Disney's finances, which, more power to you.

Long history of what exactly that would be bad for someone that wants people back on the board that actually care about the Disney brand? You're likely going to point to his investment track record. And to that I would say you are comparing one thing (financial performance) to another thing...

I politely disagree. If you want things to change, you must make changes. Simple as that. To say Peltz is the wrong choice is to say you can predict the future. So I'll leave it at that.

If you're happy about this vote, please stop complaining on here about every decision Disney makes. more of the same = more of the same

They will not stay on top of Universal without significant parks investments in Florida. Epic Universe is coming soon...

You're exactly right in that they will never admit it. It's a corporation. What they'll do instead is they'll make safe bets, like sequels. This is actually exactly what they just announced on their earnings call. Then at some point in the next few years they'll start to release more original...

What's that saying? Garbage in, garbage out. Disney has lots it's way. Probably will take 5-10 years for them to recover their perception as a good family company. And that's only if they stop producing politicized trash.

There's a difference between not caring and being incompetent.

There used to be lengthy discussion about this on here for about the year after epic universe was first shown. Many, many people said that Disney couldn't care less about epic universe. I always took the stance that they cared very much and I can tell you with certainty after looking at what...

Of course it did, it was meant to be cartoonish and thus had style over realism. In other words, it was much better than what we've seen so far. Everything so far in this reboot of the ride just looks cheap and poorly done. That water tower... This is Magic Kingdom, the premier family vacation...

Gasp! The plants on the outside of Splash were fake??? My point was that the new plants look piled on top of each other and very fake. Overall the exterior, as of now, looks terrible. Might get better in the end, though, I have my doubts.

This ride looks terrible so far, what's with all the fake plants on the outside? Apparently Bob Iger walked the ride recently and said it was "boring". Hopefully these new board members can help get Disney back on track. I'd say the company is about 100 feet from the cliff, but still going too...

Completely wrong. Read the actual Media Matters report. They did not disclose how they manipulated the system to get those results. That is why they will lose in court. By the way, the founder of Media Matters has some interesting blog posts you should go read before you continue to defend them...