Search results

I for one am really sad it did. It was probably the best Disney experience I have ever had. To me it is pretty obvious that the cost structure of the thing (recoup of capex + opex) could not accommodate the lower prices needed to fill the hotel. I would guess the opex part of that is more...

Agree with everything you said. I didn’t mean to suggest that I knew it was fake or not. But one thing you mentioned and I should have in my short review. Show up at 3pm. The security line to get in just before 1pm was almost 90 minutes long. Our friends showed at 3 and walked right in. The line...

Reading this I wonder if this person was really on the cruise versus writing a fake review. The theming on the Halcyon is first rate. The rooms are decent and why would you spend a ton of time in them?! It does not seem small, and you get familiar enough with it over the experience that it is...

Just finished my cruise last Wednesday (May 30 voyage). I have to say it is absolutely awesome. What was interesting to me is how some things (lightsaber training) were underwhelming because clearly for little kids (who loved it) and other things (bridge training) were more than I had expected...

For some reason this resonated with me. Basically the only people who get treated to Disney service of the 1980s are Club33 and Golden Oak residents. If they have a problem it gets fixed asap.

the work on Tom Sawyer Island was an emergency?

I just read this and had honestly forgotten Beach was closed. I was at Yacht for Columbus Day weekend. The resort and pool were just a shade shy of "packed" from my numerous other visits. Longer lines at the water slide than during our usual March trip, more people in the pool/lazy river. Hard...

my gosh has it been years since PhotoDave posted?!

to be honest I saw it on a great night for the wind and thought it was ok, too short, and it did not leave me wanting to see it again like RoE or Fantasmic

One can hope that this means Dinoland will get redone entirely at some point. RoL was OK but not worth seeing twice.

Agree on all fronts. But ask yourself whether you would rather that he still started epic threads here. I’d take him back warts and all if it were up to me.

You do remind a lot of us of Spirit. I thought you were him but have been reliably informed that you aren’t. Too bad. I actually miss his stuff.

You are cracking me up. Rick Scott is on tv saying congress is about to agree to immunize business for COVID and you are talking about slip and falls. By the way they could eliminate state slip and fall liability on exactly the aggregation theory of Wickard and Raich. No question not even close...

Please explain how the purely intrastate possession of marijuana can be criminalized by the federal government. Raich says the commerce clause allows that. That goes back to Wickard v Fillburn. And you still haven’t explained how Title II of the civil rights act could possibly be constitutional...

Read my total of 3 posts and fewer than 500 words on this subject. I never said Congress gave immunity to the airlines, I said Congress could do so and cited the analogous act of limiting airline liability. I would be delighted to see your constitutional analysis of how Congress lacks the power...

My gosh so much of this is false. The 911 Act limits liability for the attacks to the extent of insurance coverage and required all suits to be filed in federal court. The liability limits applied to state law suits and claims to the compensation fund...

Sorry but this is just wrong. Congress’s power to regulate interstate commerce and its power to preempt state liability law mean it can totally immunize Disney. Of course it can. The 911 act has nothing to do with the FAA. It had to do with protecting the airlines from ruinous state law...

Just about every word of the below is wrong. Congress can do what it likes to shield public accommodations from liability, it can do so retroactively, as can Florida, and there aren’t typically conditions. The 911 Act cited by another is a good example. Limited airline liability to the extent of...

I don’t presume to know where people get their information from or to whom they repeat things they read on whatever website they visit. However, I will bother to call out totally misinformed talk when I see it here because that might stop people from repeating it And everything I said is backed...

This is total and complete fear mongering and it is frankly irresponsible. First, the WHO has just said the virus is of very low risk to children, for whatever reason people under 19 have had few cases. Second, it is only of high risk to the elderly and those with preexisting conditions. Third...