Search results

It will be so incredibly ironic that Disney targeted a massive overhaul of DAS for misuse against their policies, that caused clogged lighting lanes; yet looks the other way if international guests take LL passes days in advance that fill lightning lanes despite being against policy. Still...

Congrats! You now have the opportunity to *checks notes* pay more for your resort onsite for the benefit of paying more to ride the same rides as before and monetize Disney's lack of planning. :banghead:

Got it so it’s gonna be similar to FP+ days; if you wait til day of visit [to purchase], good luck.

Sure thing, now let’s get you to bed gramps ;)

So does this replace Genie+ or complement it?

Disneyland is heavily Keyholder / local based, but I’m sure you already knew that.

Crazy how people still fall for that “Disney strategy”. Disney wants crowds.

That tracks, given Seaworld is extremely reliant on local and discounted admission visitors. They need to make up for lost admission revenue

Yep. And being in Florida, I can tell you they’re not flying here to hang out indoors at our local Walmart

Agreed, a perception minefield. It’s just better avoided; even if not illegal, bad publicity is something I’m sure WDW wants to avoid

Been saying for a bit now that hopefully they wouldn’t be doing that. It’s a minefield they need not attempt stepping in

Not so with standby. You don’t tap in. So the people who were getting a return time for ToT then going to wait 60 minutes for MFSR were going undetected

Correct to me it’s more to verify it’s a doctor signing not a third party signing on their behalf or in the extreme cases, a person forging an entire doctor’s note

No worries. It’s a pipe dream but that’s where a notary would help really filter the fakers out. A public notary usually isn’t willing to risk the consequences by skirting the rules

I’m talking of a case where someone actually forged their own document and/or the doctors signature and never actually spoke with the named doctor

I mean if they discover a case where the doctors note itself was forged.

Hence the second layer where you sign an affidavit to Disney outlining the penalties if lying. It’s similar to when people sign documents under penalty of perjury, most of the time it’s not checked up on but just the threat of such a severe consequence gets most people to be honest or think twice

Again will the doctor be willing to sign a notarized document WITH the specific reasons and symptoms? I feel that is a barrier to exaggeration as most doctors won’t sign a legal document as such if they don’t personally evaluate and know that those are your actual symptoms

A cynical take but reasonable. But the documentation option I presented just now in another post would solve that. It shouldn’t be a note saying “x person has anxiety and can’t wait in lines”. It needs to lay a clear and specific line of symptoms and reasons and how it affects that specific scenario

A document notarized and signed by the disabled guest and/or their guardian, from a doctor or medically qualified person stating 1. The person in question 2. Their disability 3. Exactly the what and why of their diagnosis that specifically affects their ability to wait in line physically...