Search results

425 would be a huge win at this point.

He's passive-aggressively insulting a large portion of the message board in a fashion so that he can try and claim plausible deniability. It's the "I never specifically called anyone a racist, I just took verbiage from their posts and said that anyone who uses that verbiage is behaving in a...

So are you insinuating that he is a racist? Or not insinuating that he is a racist?

"Hey! Stop noticing that the other guy seemed to call most of the message board a racist!" "This is a 'discussion.' So that means we speak and you read."

Umm ... so are you calling him (and a large portion of the message board) a racist? Or not calling him a racist? Your most recent posts contradict themselves.

Oooof ... they couldn't even get Vox to pretend it was good.

Studios aren't going to hire her if they think she could tank the entire film during a press junket.

Yes, it's a clause that prohibits one or more parties from revealing certain information.

I'm willing to bet there is a non-disclosure clause in the contract of every Disney actor. I have no idea what it covers or doesn't cover.

Sounds like Disney World circa-2025

"New songs, some added scenes, a couple new characters people will love. I'm not sure what I'm allowed to share because Disney has sworn us to secrecy to maintain the surprises!"

Of course you did. You plainly stated what you think she should have done (as did I). That is a recommended course of action.

You can disagree all you want; your recommended course of action likely cost Disney a couple hundred million dollars (and ended Zeigler's career as a leading lady).

No, she's supposed to say, "It's gonna be exciting. You'll just have to wait and see how we blended the fantastic original classic with some new elements and songs," ... like a normal actress with more than 5 minutes of media training would have done.

She also explained why it was going to differ from the original; an explanation that branded the original as problematic. And that is why the public rejected her.

You're living in a false reality that is 100 years old. That's on you. However, it is not the responsibility of the rest of the public (and/or Disney) to pretend it is actual reality. Maybe social engineering was necessary (or productive) 100 years ago (or 60 years ago), but I vehemently...

The public isn't interested in your social engineering and the box office results demonstrate it repeatedly.

Conspiracies not "conspiracy theories." They are no longer theories when they are verified. "Stop talking about what I don't want to talk about."

That can't possibly be correct because we were told over, and over, and over (and over) again on this very message board that the 7 Hobos of Benneton were never intended to be in the film and that they were simply stand-ins for the CGI dwarf characters that were always intended to be in the film.

It's a website that simultaneously (a) controls the discourse in popular culture, and (b) nobody has ever heard of.