Search results

I thought it was closer to 22 knots. The bridge report should tell you

It's not that bad. Imagine if they took a building that was overbuilt to last 40 years ago and demolished it only to replace it with something similar yet not quite right. Now that would be a waste of money.

There was a time long ago when Epcot had a theme, and this would have fit right in. There was also a time long ago when Disney was an innovator, and this would have been amazing to see them do. Instead, we are going to get a show that had could have been great.

Disney isn't that foolish. It's only 2 with the special Silver Anniversary pricing.

You had me worried for a second that you had been hacked. We know this isn't happening. Mickey and Minnie have new anniversary costumes that aren't free.

Is there anyone who truly thinks it belongs in Epcot? It certainly doesn't belong in the original idea of Epcot, and it doesn't even fit in the Epcot when they decided to do it. I suppose anything belongs in Epcot of today, though. If we're being honest, it should have gone in Hollywood...

Dear sir, it is a very convenient way to strip another 35-50/person from the "guests." They used to create the problem and sell a solution. Selling the solution to a problem that doesn't exist is just evolution.

Us knowing this isn't important. Corporate needs to hear this and truly understand it. Bookings are not where they should be for Orlando, and they need to eventually admit it's their errors.

He is right; you would likely be fine. It's just too darn risky. In 20+ years of cruising, I have only done the morning of two times. Both times the stress was overwhelming. I made it, but I did not enjoy the worry at all. For what a hotel costs relative to missing that ship, there is no...

We had a friend who recently tried DCL for the first time on the Fantasy, and we told her she should have tried the Wish first. I have the same feeling that a first time cruiser would enjoy the Wish. The Wish was still enjoyable; it just isn't what the others are. The sole exception to that...

I wish this was a surprise, but it is follows their usual way of thinking. It is a little odd from a business perspective, though. They have the land and construction is negligible, so it is just an easy profit item if they did it. It's not as if they would sit empty.

they lower them into hourglass lake at night for cleaning, so this isn't that unusual

Great review and spot on based on our sailing. We were excited to give it a try, and I did my best to remain open minded despite the reviews and word of mouth. We could not have been much less disappointed. I was still happy to be at sea and we still found moments to enjoy, but I can't think...

Wow, I hadn't considered this possibility, but it is a real concern now that you mention it. The many (and some major) missteps on the Wish might see similar shore side repeats on LP

Which Royal ship is on that itinerary?

How accurate yet something I don't need to imagine. Now I can't get this imagery out of my head.

I certainly don't hate them on those two nights. But, I would gladly go without them if it means the other 363 nights I do not have to deal with them. Let's not forget, even on those two nights it is still 365 days when they ruin the view across the lagoon. If they leave, I promise none of us...

The hits keep coming with this lot in charge. I hadn't thought about this, but it's too true.

I thought it was little people

All of your points were so accurate. I was curious if maybe I was wrong about the Wish, but we just got back from the Fantasy. What a difference between those two ships. The Wish is certainly a pretty ship, and we had a good times but just almost ever part of the ship seemed to miss the mark...