Search results

It’s amazing what you can get access to if you just ask. I was a CM at the time. I’m sure it would be a lot more difficult to get in otherwise. I’ve seen so many interesting places throughout WDW, by either setting up tours or asking. I even drove right into the studio lot in Burbank, couldn’t...

I visited this warehouse a couple times many years ago. The photos of the Figment AA I posted several pages back were from here. While some of the items in the warehouse could certainly have been being stored for archives, at least half if not the majority of the warehouse was housing office...

It seemed pretty legitimate to me. I suppose without it being directly linked to an Orange Couty government site there’s a chance someone faked it. It seemed very consistent and seems to be a different copy version of the report , if someone faked it they went to a lot of trouble.

I did drop it a long time ago. Others like yourself keep bringing it back up and attributing things I never said to this. I never asked for details. I simply analyzed what Martin said. So maybe as it turns out, you need to drop it.

I think the difference there is those are more forward looking things and more of a speculative nature. This is an event in the past and is a lot more fact based. It either happened or it didn’t. Either way you’re point is valid and he’s entitled to withold his knowledge or opinions for this or...

I disagree what you’ve described has already happened. Just different insiders involved. The reason the legitimate news didn’t run the story until the police report was available is because they’re not going to rely solely on an insider, no matter who the insider is.

Look I’ve said what I’ve said. Continuing to repeat it isn’t going to help you and others understand. I think it’s time we all agree to disagree and move back to discussing the topic.

We're not talking about details here that could implicate any source. It's just a simple yes or no. Countless members have already stated their opinion here on the subject as well as making definitive statements this would be no different. I don't feel entitled to an answer and I'm not asking...

The possibility exists that the person who did this could post here or talk to someone who posts here. So by monitoring I don’t mean to say they’re obsessively checking this site, but assuming they’re taking investigating this seriously they would be negligent not to take at least a glance at...

Again never asked for sensitive information.

Again I never asked for details, only a simple yes, no or I don't know. I'm satisfied his answer points to yes. There's no need to be vague about it, but it is what it is and if we can all agree that's what his intention is then I think we can let it rest at that.

Since I assume you guys are referring to me, I just want to reiterate I was not questioning Martins credibility, merely pointing out that he hadn’t really said anything at all. Since this isn’t a situation where hinting at the final outcome protects a source there’s absolutely no reason to hide...

Honestly even if they installed him in GotG as Buzzy, I still would rather not see that happen. Also this could explain why it was tagged by archives but not removed. They could’ve had tentative plans to use it in the attractions and archives may have tagged it to create a failsafe to protect...

It doesn’t sound that unreasonable to test the animatronic. Even if justnto document its condition for the archives. I don’t have a thorough understand of them, but I think we’ve all seen that when programming shows they generally bring in the equipment to control it. So it doesn’t at least on...

It seems totally plausible that they could be planning to add him to the GotG queue. Could be a good bang for buck addition to the queue, no big investment in an animatronic and all they’d have to do is move it next door. If that’s the case and if he was stolen, then personally I would be...

Yeah the thing is it doesn’t really serve any purpose to drop a hint as to wether it was stolen or not, It’s not protecting anyone’s identity. It could just simply be his opinion or guess. In any case it seems he’s clarified enough that I think we all agree his position is it was stolen. So at...

I never said I didn’t trust him and never asked for more detail. My only point was this scenario isn’t something where saying yes or no would implicate a source of the information. So the obvious conclusion is if someone is just dropping hints then they probably don’t actually know for sure and...

So obviously you’re implying it was stolen. Why not just say that?

Not exactly. It’s possible the archives department was upset about the clothing being stolen and removed it without authorization. When you look at a statement like that you can twist it to fit almost any outcome. So it’s essentially meaningless. I just wish people would say I don’t know rather...

Officers definitely will engage in online conversations, I would suspect in this situation they’re definitely monitoring this thread, they would be crazy not to. I’m just waiting for this to go to court and have them enter this discussion as some sort of evidence for some reason so it can all...