Search results

Tokyo Dining is a part of TiW but I didn't factor in that discount as I am not an AP holder...ran those calculations too and I can make (2) 5 day trips with park hoppers per year with the usual discounts offered and it was essentially a break even as well. We usually are a once or twice a year...

Ok, finally caught up in this thread and wanted to comment on the comparison of MyMagic+ to the dining plan brought up by @RSoxNo1. We are planning an anniversary trip in June (let's just say we won't be collecting restaurant pagers to queue up for Dueling Dumbos) and out of curiosity I did a...

Agreed about the ability of an immersive land based on an irrelevant property to be successful...I would argue though that Avatar is relevant, but not in a good way. It is fine if an IP doesn't draw you into a land on its own merit, but at a cursory glance it shouldn't turn you away, which I...

I think Splash works because people don't associate it with Song of the South. It was a win for Disney because they could introduce something new to this generation without having to take the time or $$$ to invent new characters. For many, those characters exist only in Splash Mountain thus it...

Posted in the Monsters, Inc. Hollywood Studios rumor thread by M.rudolf: "RSR MI coaster Rat clone Flo's. diner Merry Christmas, this is the latest as of 3pm today posted as soon as I could due to travel"

I believe M Rudolf mentioned it just before Christmas somewhere on the boards...

A consequence of construction, or lack thereof?

So many rich possibilities for the most coherently themed of the parks you almost can't go wrong...and yet...

Good distinction. I agree.

You make a good sell for Pandora with your nighttime description...and again I have no problem with fictional plants or animals in the park, but I think there is a fundamental conceptual problem with an entire land in Animal Kingdom being devoted to a land created for a movie when the rest of...

I get the conservation theme viewpoint, but I disagree. To me, that is a stretch. Would "An Inconvenient Truth" be a good IP for Animal Kingdom simply for its conservation themes? I also agree that fictional animals should play a strong role in the park. However, when you have to explain how...

Even if its imagery is incredible and theme park appropriate, does its incredible-ness automatically make it fit for THIS theme park? If we agree to overlook the obvious no animal thing (no small feat) and take it from a strictly visual perspective, it has no place in this park. Like it or not...