Search results

It's still less; my point is if they can offer a non-discriminating security experience without charging more than Disney World, then Disney can too.

It's more TSA-like as is with its "random" selection process. There's little less magical than being pulled away from your family and friends for a "random" screen. USH's method ensures EVERYONE is on equal ground and no one feels singled out. I personally think the entire things is a waste of...

Gah, Universal Studios Hollywood has figured this out; why can't Disney?

Is it really a loss of capacity if a ride doesn't even make use of a third of its potential?

Well, let's not get carried away here. DisneySea's Aquatopia and DCA's Luigi's Rollickin' Roadsters are both LPS rides too :D

It's not, and I never said that. My point is the ride feels half-assed for an "E Ticket"--and the lack of animatronics is only a supporting factor in a ride where they would have been well-suited. Ratatouille pushes ZERO boundaries and its use of screens & vehicle movement isn't nearly as...

I'm not a big fan of Frozen either. My comparison wasn't meant to be favorable Totally agreed on Let It Go as well

What's not to love about the complete lack of animatronics or meaningful set dressing

Where did I insinuate wait times had anything to do with it? Despite your intentions, I'd argue Ratatouille is closer to Frozen than a proper E Ticket. Although it doesn't particularly matter as it's all semantics. My point is there's a very clear deficit in thematic details and overall ride...

There's no way it's an E. It comes up short in so many ways compared to the true E's. It's a solid D

It's a truly beautiful building. Ironic, given its state

It's weird to me to take this attitude with what is considered by many to be the pinnacle of Disney's ride design. As a "known issue," I'm sure they had some very good reasons for taking a few creative liberties for the individual betterment of both the ride and the pre-show. The 0.1% will never...

Something that 99.9% of people will never notice is cringe-worthy now? Odds are the Hollywood sign is exactly where it is because it simply looks better; it would probably look odd and unbalanced if it were above where the towers are, without the towers actually being there. I mean, this is the...

Those vignettes are almost literally just random scenes. It's fine to be excited by Rocket's entrance (I like it too!), but the climax of the story is like 5 seconds later. The ride is a far cry from Disney's best when it comes to telling a story (and is greatly inferior to the ride it replaced...

Gotcha, that's good to know, because I was just looking at maps of SW in DL and it looks like there's an expansion pad to the east (according to Micechat), plus Toon Town if they want to go nuts.

Looking at that map, does SW have room to expand? It looks like the roads, hotel, and Toy Story Land have it landlocked, besides the southwest corner, which I don't know if it's accessible or not? I might be mistaken, but doesn't SW have room to expand into at DL? I just wonder if this is a...

What storytelling? The story is practically over by the time the ride begins. Don't get me wrong, I quite like the ride, but the "story" is pure nonsense

One might say that's fitting given the non-restrictive, expanding nature of space

Yep, like what I mentioned with Star Tours earlier, where they claimed it wouldn't have the same movement as at Disneyland. Although every once in a while, they do hit on something true for WDW, so I was curious how much truth there may be to their WDW SW claims--regardless of how exaggerated...

I mean, I already clarified I was talking about their tone, which you seemingly agree with, only you refer to it as "spinning." I really don't know what we're arguing about. I was just interested in Marni's response to their "tone" or "spin" if you prefer, which seemed contrary to his own...