Search results

That is not really how self insurance works (I know that is what Wikipedia says, I can read as well, it doesn't make it correct in the case of large corporations that choose to self-insure) , and this is again, splitting hairs. In most cases of self-insurance, the company assumes the risk, but...

The initial post I was responding to basically painted Disney as a bogey man company who could just pay out of pocket to deal with a 100 deaths a year and didn't need insurance to deal with it. The original post did reference an insurance company, which I was wrong about them having. However...

Self-Insurance in large companies, and not carrying insurance are two different things. It can be splitting hairs here, but I assume it means they manage it themselves instead of having third party insurance. I don't want to get into a discussion about the nuances, but they are "insured." You...

Did you really just insinuate that Disney doesn’t carry insurance for most aspects of their business? 😂ok

Go ride the Time Masheen

That's good, although I'm never telling them that. I want them to always be mortified when they think about it.

OFF TOPIC STORY ALERT: I had friends who had a cousin who wanted their ashes spread on Disney property, but those entrusted with the ashes were not too familiar with the ins and outs of WDW. They knew that the person had liked to stay at Wilderness Lodge and when they were in the lobby, they...

I just don't get the tone of this thread, especially some of the more "angry" responses. 1. The OP is a little full of themselves, sure, but they haven't really suggested anything outlandish or ridiculous. 2. A few people believe the OP's insider cred and are treating it as such. (perhaps a...

Ovitz....there’s a blast from the past. Is it appropriate that my autocorrect tried to change his name to Obits?

While I take everything on Twitter with a grain of salt, I don’t see anything in the tweet history there that denotes an axe to grind.

If that’s the case that is a major training issue.

All evidence to the contrary tonight if it was still running, someone with authority to make the decision determined it was safe to keep the other line open.

I’m not saying they don’t need to follow up and be thorough in investigation of the incident. But quite often in accidents the equipment failure or human error that caused it is known almost as it is happening. If, as others have noted may be the case, the uniqueness of this line was involved...

It’s possible they knew what caused it from the moment it happened and that it was safe to keep runnng the other line. I would guess they at least thought about closing the whole system.

You didn’t give a source, why should Drew?

In the words of Darth Vader. “ I am altering the deal, pray that I don’t alter it any further.”

If this is true, it could put things like Owner's Locker out of business.

Got to make sure the agenda of the inciting article remains the focal point, don’t you.