Search results

We don’t know. The company didn’t publish them. They didn’t post what their expected marks were and where specific components didn’t meet those internal goals. You want so bad for the original park to be the same success for the company that it was for you, and clearly, due to a variety of...

Good arguments (a bit hard to read in a few places due to odd punctuation, but... typing on phones) and what I’ve been saying. The general public wasn’t aware of missed metrics, failed goals and unrealized expectations of Disney mgmnt. We only saw a “perfect passion project” that from the day it...

I don’t think “look at animals” and “watch movies” are the core mission statements of those respective parks.

I’m confused. So are you for or against tap lights added onto spaceship earth? I’ve lost you here.

While it was successful out of the gate, Short term gain vs long term investment can apply here. The financial model they funded the park on was flawed and became more so over time. The fact that mgmt didn’t restructure that in a way that assumed Disney would foot more of the bill caused more...

Mistake was probably not the best choice of words, but I get what he is saying. EPCOT center was an attempt at reconciling a visionary dream of Disney with a reality that could actually happen. I feel like it was a project that needed to happen and Disney changed because of it, but shifts in...

Well stated. I was lucky enough to have experienced that “mistake”, and loved that “mistake”, but am clear headed enough to realize that yes, it was an experiment, experience, and product, not of even it’s time, but of about a decade before. It was amazing, but our world has changed. I do think...

There are better ways to engage and inform that being condescending and superior though. I for one would totally discount anything intelligent you had to say if you started by responding to me that way.

Here come the “I’m smarter than you” authorities.

They wouldn’t provide the intended effect if they were recessed and didn’t protrude enough for the LED to was the panels with light.

Sadly, a result of our overly litigation minded culture. Since these are “added on” and not part of the original structure, it’s most likely required by code, or at least legal to minimize risk.

What do these actually attach to (dock) are there slightly submerged docks? These aren’t moored yo the bottom, correct? I’m just wondering if at some point when “test and adjust” is complete would they retreat to backstage to be repainted or have some type of lower level screening attached, then...

Horrible name. Doesn’t even have any branding thought at all.

Agree. And the bedazzled Disneyland crowns look like a crafter went crazy with a glue gun and a few pounds of sequins.

hush up with your informed response - he's trying to impress you with his knowledge.

That’s one of the dumbest ideas I’ve ever seen. What does the Disneyland it’s a small world facade have to do with ANYTHING at Epcot? Are you just trolling for responses now. If so, I’m annoyed I fell for it!

I don’t believe there are strobes all over the surface, and I appreciate the fact they are NOT doing projections, but an actual, surface mounted lighting effect. I think the issue with projections is the same as they’ve always had, how do you light the tip top where the angle and curve makes...

ROE were much smaller and self propelled /driven units. These are not moving (and I seriously doubt ever really were seriously considered as doing such)

Ha ha. That’s funny!

Remember the days when pieces of buildings were designed to retract because they blocked a little bit of the view of the last few minutes of a 10 minute fireworks show? Now we park aircraft landing barges in the center of the park all day that block the view for 90% of the operating day just do...