Search results

He hasn’t been running his mouth in the sense of saying a lot but rather saying things that have no definitive information. You used the saying first in reference to the other guy, It applies here as well not to the same extent though.

I don’t think his accuracy is really relevant in this thread since he hasn’t really given any information one way or the other.

He’s said something without saying anything at all. It could be interpreted either way no matter what the outcome. He doesn’t need to give details a simple yes or no would work. That’s pretty much the definition of “running his mouth” to me.

Martin said unauthorized removal. That could mean stolen or it could mean not stolen but removed internally without the right process. This very much equates to “running his mouth” as you say. I like and respect Martin for many reason, but well it is what it is.

I wonder if Martin or any other “insiders” would be able to answer if Buzzy (the actual animatronic) was actually stolen with a simple definitive yes, no or I don’t know? Shouldn’t be any issue with revealing sources with just an answer with no details.

Because when the actual facts eventually come out if anything doesn’t line up it’ll ruin their track record. The interesting thing about this particular rumor is unlike the vast majority of other theme park rumors it’s based on the past. So unlike other rumors about future additions changes etc...

I think this is the most reasonable conclusion to draw and so most people have accepted this. The whole AA being stolen by a team of people backstage is the more exciting and interesting story so of course we would all like to believe that, but just doesn’t seem to be adding up. I think the...

Yeah I think this summarizes the key points perfectly. I would add to this that the report of clothing being stolen casts some doubt on most of the “insiders” giving us information on this topic. Unless I missed something I don’t believe any of them ever mentioned this point prior to the report...

I’m guessing that he had admitted to sneaking back to take photos/video and possibly had intended to show this as some sort of proof that he didn’t steal anything. Purely a guess, but it’s the only thing I could see as to why he would bring his phone and certainly why he would pull it out and...

The report states that he took the phone simultaneously with saying he intended to leave prior to the officer telling him they were keeping the phone. It doesn’t state that the officer asked him to turn over the phone. Again I’m no lawyer, but given just what’s written here I think he would have...

It appears to me the report seems to imply that he was free to leave the questioning. The officer stated after he said he was leaving he told him they were keeping his phone. Seems to me the response if he wasn’t free to go would’ve been something more along the lines of “you’re not free to go...

Speaking of the phone since that appears to be the cause for resisting. I find it interesting that the report contradicts itself. The report claims that he stated he was leaving and took his phone. This seems perfectly reasonable to me for someone who’s there voluntarily and decided they no...

I think it’s really hard for them to pursue trespassing charges for someone wandering into an area they shouldn’t be. Once someone is trespassed and then found on property it’s very clear cut, but that’s a two step process. The simple solution would be to install doors that require a card or...

I don’t know, five minutes of fun I guess. People do it all the time. I’m not saying I don’t believe it was him, I just don’t see anything that points solidly in either direction.

Well clearly you have nothing of any value to add to this. Sometimes “forum insiders” are no different than psychics. Keep things vague, pretend to know everything, and offer no real information.

Haha, true. I’m just thinking when you get interrogated and vomit on the floor that might be a “$&!@ just got real” moment and you might start taking things more seriously. I’m certainly not discounting the possibility that that isn’t the case though, some people are just really dumb.

I didn’t ask your opinion, I asked if there was anything that substantially linked the account to him. Like I said I’m skeptical someone would start a new account in this scenario. It could happen, would be really dumb, but yeah I wouldn’t rule it out. I believe this is also the account the...

I never read anything from any of these accounts so I’m kind of in the dark on the content. I’m just highly skeptical that a second account is real. Why would you shut down an account only to start another. I’m also thinking someone intimidated to the point of vomiting on the floor wouldn’t run...

Was there anything that substantially showed that was an account from the same person and not just someone trying to get in on the excitement?

I’m no lawyer, but I have a feeling he’s getting out of that resisting charge. It’s seems like a bit of a stretch to me. Obviously we’re not getting a perfectly clear picture in a paragraph description though. I wonder if they’re even able to access his phone and even more interesting would be...