Search results

well I do agree we shouldn't only focus on the yeti. The yeti is flashy so it gets more clout than other broken WDW attraction effects. But it's one piece of a much bigger problem. TWDC just doesn't seem to think there's any point in fixing their attractions and making sure they're firing on all...

Lol exactly man. I love Joe Rohde don't get me wrong and I have huge respect for the guy as an imagineer...but his answer here was just ridiculous. The yeti isn't some uniquely complex problem TWDC just can't find any opportunity to fix. TWDC never fixes their d@m attractions lol. The yeti is...

Not to sound rude....but why does it have to be a contest? Everytime the yeti's mentioned these days, a number of folks feel the need to undermine the problem and prove that other attractions have it worse. TOT, or SSE, or IASW. But it's not a contest for what attraction has the most broken...

I think one of the fundamental differences between the Eisner years and the Iger years is that under Eisner, Disney grew significantly as a company but its brand identity stayed basically the same. Mickey, Disneyland/WDW, the princesses/animated films, etc. That's what "Disney" was for most...

it's solid. But I don't think it's as much of a standout to your average guest as it would be with the yeti. It's still a very good ride, but not a "Wow!" ride. That is the incentive TWDC has to fix it. It should be a stand out in someone's memory and a reason to travel back to WDW. Currently...

Here's the thing with the yeti. Current WDC thinking is likely that, because guest satisfaction with EE is high even without the yeti, there's no reason to spend huge sums of money to 'fix what ain't broke.' Most people don't even know the yeti exists. But is it harming guest experience? 100%...

well I mean I haven't read Disney Wars, nor was I keeping up with the interworkings of TWDC pre-Iger. So my knowledge on this subject is gonna be inferior to yours. That said, the WDC fundamentally shifted the second they became a public company. It's just the name of the game, large megacorps...

Uh-huh. Do you know what an ad hominem fallacy is? he did have a 'point' ^^ ^^ which you then replied to with this ad hominem fallacy, attacking how @Sirwalterraleigh conducts himself across all forum topics (completely irrelevant), instead of addressing the actual content of what he's...

this is yet another example of your inflated ego 💁🏽‍♂️ nobody here requires your validation. But if you disagree with someone you can either politiely tell them why, or keep quiet and ignore them.

Lol, some of you folks on this board are so small and petty. It's honestly kind of a shame. Because there are a lot of cool people here. But then some inflated jerk comes along and ruins it.

I'm not chuckling at The Marvels' failure— I'm chuckling at the notion that it'll get any where close to 200 million shy of the first film. As for whether Iman is the most charismatic actor since RDJ, I think that's going a little far but I do like her. I'll admit I was being a little...

hahah... I got flack for TLM too. Doesn't change the fact that I'll be here chuckling to myself when it doesn't make nearly as much money as folks seem to think it will. 😎

that fair, but I think the term culture war is misleading from the get go and is overly sensationalistic. America is politically divided, that much has been statistically proven. But it's less a war between cultures and more typical political polarization that has its roots way deeper than the...

BB is gonna bomb hard. Unless it's really good, in which case it has a little more of a shot Marvels is also gonna go over like a 'wet fart'... no chance that film does well

it's just political polarization. the term 'culture war' is a BS narrative peddled by figureheads. no doubt political tensions are high. but I'd bet a lot of money it doesn't stem from warring 'cultures.'

why in god's name are people so obsessed with this culture war nonsense... it's such B.S. we all know this right? like the culture "war" is ridiculous and 100% does not exist.

it ain't a piece of Animal Kingdom. wouldn't fit there, don't fit here either. a piece of ADVENTURELAND, more aptly

I've actually never ridden toad before, but I have never once met anyone who didn't prefer it to pooh. and 20k vs mermaid....🤢 hell I prefer the new sucky subs at DL over MERMAID....

it actually looks really cool, doesn't fit the aesthetic of futureworld but in adventureland I'd be kinda-sorta excited for this.

what???? who in gods name prefers pooh and mermaid to toad and 20k? did they hit their heads? my mom loves pooh and even she prefers toad. and no one likes mermaid.