Search results

Comparing it to cutting in line is a false equivalency. It was, and still will be, by the book. You realize with this change there can still be a child who rides twice, thus “cutting” the line. And yes, the Disney magic does/did make it socially acceptable. It’s what does, or at least used to...

So make a family wait for upwards of two hours, twice, for say, slinky dog, so that one extra person doesn’t get a ride? Sounds so magical. I personally can’t wait to tell my kids that only one of them get to ride with their grandfather unless they want to wait for another 2 hours. Also, I’m...

Ya I understand the tech. And it might be just me. But if I spent multiple hundreds of millions of dollar bucks, I’d want software/hardware to be robust enough to not knock the marquee attraction off line for multiple hours a day multiple days since opening because of dropped wifi signals. Down...

Heaven forbid a parent or *gasp* a grandparent waiter in a family of three or greater children want to get to ride with more than a single child. Presciently “More relevant” Unbelievably “More timeless” Heaping gobs of “More Disney” A giant, GotG sized box of “More family”

Hysterical if true.

Ahh gotcha. I don’t know Star Wars lingo. I don’t disagree with you though on number of attractions per land. Spend another few hundred million for an additional A & B or a C+ ride. Edit: oh he’s an imagineer too. Neat.

Haven’t they in the past soft opened attractions/perks prior the announced date? At least that’s what I’m hoping for.

Star Wars Land would like a word.

He takes theme parks way too seriously.

If they’re ok with Pixar and Star Wars and Avatar, I don’t see why we can’t have Hello, Dolly!

I’m of the opinion these two things do not read related to one another. Besides “fancy” Victorianism. Eh, I’ve belabored my point enough. I’ll leave it be.

If you can’t tell it’s “inspired by” or “themed to” unless explicitly told, what’s the point?

Would make far more sense than this. Hello Dolly is quintessentially American. I’d bet @eddiesoto would be on board with Dolly Levi and crew getting some attention. Edit: Oh man, when did Eddie leave? Was such a treat having him on the forums.

Not a bother per se, I just typically don’t respond with such passion to posts I disagree with, I just read it and move on. But it’s all good. I don’t mind a lively debate. I think you’ll find my initial comments on most every thread aren’t replies to anyone. I state an opinion and then do my...

Yes I rejected the idea. My comment was the first one. My later comments of rejection expounded on my reasoning. You chose two still images from the films to back your point. I chose two stills from the same films to back my point. Interpret that however you’d like. I only say it because my...

So I can’t disagree with you that she evokes early twentieth century grandeur? Okey dokey. Isn’t everyone on these boards “ideologically invested” in some form or fashion to varying degrees over items of personal taste? Otherwise why would we all be here and spend our hard earned dollar bucks...

The differentiation between story/storytelling and narrative is a literary construct, not a themed entertainment one. Imagineering uses it as a foundation, but the idea is rooted in literary theory. Story, Plot, and Narrative

I see what you did there. Cheeky Character dining experiences in which you pay to have you or your children get photos with beloved characters in thematic appropriate garb is more of a necessary “evil” if you will. If they aren’t there, the experience makes no sense. The “subtle” attempt at...

Storytelling ≠ narrative

There is a mighty large difference between having characters in the dining room dressed period appropriate and whatever this is. But for like the hundredth time, this is all my opinion, blah, blah, blah. Can’t help but find it interesting that my “zealotry” has made the discussion...