Eisner was kind of better for the parks, and he seemed to genuinely like Disney, unlike Iger, who has no liking or understanding of Walt's legacy except where it might make a buck. But Eisner wasn't that good for the studio. He nearly lost Pixar, and of course started the buying-of-castoff-IP spree with his ridiculous purchase of the Muppets, a practice Iger pounced on with glee. Now, I wouldn't mind the purchase of stuff like Marvel and Star Wars if they were limited to movie production only; those franchises make money, which is good for the company and maybe help the parks? But no, Iger has to stick them into the parks as well, and that's what disgusts me. Seeing tacky dippy superheroes like the Hulk running around in Walt's parks make me sick. So anyway, Eisner was a mixed bag. I can't say I miss him that much.