• The new WDWMAGIC iOS app is here!
    Stay up to date with the latest Disney news, photos, and discussions right from your iPhone. The app is free to download and gives you quick access to news articles, forums, photo galleries, park hours, weather and Lightning Lane pricing. Learn More
  • Welcome to the WDWMAGIC.COM Forums!
    Please take a look around, and feel free to sign up and join the community.

MK Cars-Themed Attractions at Magic Kingdom

Chi84

Premium Member
Can we agree that an argument could be made that the standards have dropped and that should be classified as unacceptable for a family spending a decade of savings on an expected standard?
Who decides how it’s acceptable for me to spend my money? You?

I don’t agree standards have dropped and I’m not spending a decade of savings.

Please stop with the hyperbole.
 

Dreamer19

Well-Known Member
Seems like a slippery slope falllacy. In no way is them taking away 14 acres for a low capacity attraction equivalent to them taking down something like Haunted Mansion or the castle both of which sell merchandise out of the park and are incredibly popular icons
Once again, there are plenty of scenarios that could have been played out where the river could have stayed AND we could have gotten some great attractions and the park would have been better for it.

You’ll likely say, “Disney knows best and they wanted to tear out the river”

Fair, but they aren’t replacing it with anything special. Frontier-National-park-cars won’t be as good or as long as RCR, we already know that. Furthermore, we already have a race track in a location that makes more sense, Tomorrowland.

Lastly, if we are losing that “boring old river and steamboat” that took up 14 acres for a giant cars ride that will contribute to an overall national-park-cars land, I would hate it, but at least that would make more thematic sense. Can we agree on that?
 

lazyboy97o

Well-Known Member
We all have our own opinions on what provides us with utility.
If you didn't grow up with LB/ROA/TSI being an attraction, then it losing its value. It was just there as we walked by. It's different when you lived it, and have fond memories. I do not. I have them for many other aspects of the parks.
Amazing how despite other arguments people have to keep defaulting to blind nostalgia being the only thing.
 

Mr. Sullivan

Well-Known Member
Amen!

Disney is currently on a two-step process. Step 1: Become like Universal. Step 2: Become more like 6 Flags. The concept of themed lands, the entire basis upon which the parks were based, is being eroded away with the silt of the river.
You really cannot be serious with this Six Flags
stuff. They are nowhere even close to being in that realm. That would have to be a course change far, far, far more dramatic than taking the river away. Six Flags level isn’t even the next step down the ladder.
 

lazyboy97o

Well-Known Member
The idea I disagree with in the post I was responding to, and in other posts like it, is that not being particularly sad about this change is synonymous with a lack of regard for the more understated and nuanced things that make Disney what it is.
It’s not synonymous but when people balk at nearly every discussion of design then it starts to suggest a lack of concern. “I don’t care. I don’t care. I don’t care. How dare you say I don’t care!”
 

MisterPenguin

President of Animal Kingdom
Premium Member
Mr. Penguin, can you point to a cohesive them for any of the four parks?
Please don’t just post a picture of young Peter Quill in front of the Epcot ball.
That's not what the post I responded to was saying.

I'm not about to fall into your bait in which you want to make an argument on a different topic because that's one you think you can win.

Try defending that WDW is becoming like Six Flags.
 

Mr. Sullivan

Well-Known Member
It’s not synonymous but when people balk at nearly every discussion of design then it starts to suggest a lack of concern. “I don’t care. I don’t care. I don’t care. How dare you say I don’t care!”
Are they balking at the discussion of design or are they balking at how some people here cannot engage in that conversation without talking to people like they’re either stupid or careless? It’s pretty plain to me a good bit of the resistance some posters here get to their points is not the points themselves, rather it is how they are delivered. No one is going to want to have a good faith conversation with someone who seems incapable of being respectful. A lot of posters here seem to think they know best and love to lord that over everyone else.
 

Chi84

Premium Member
It’s not synonymous but when people balk at nearly every discussion of design then it starts to suggest a lack of concern. “I don’t care. I don’t care. I don’t care. How dare you say I don’t care!”
It’s easy. You don’t care about how some things affect the design (“I don’t care”) but you do care about others (“How dare you say I don’t care”).
 

TrainsOfDisney

Well-Known Member
If you didn't grow up with LB/ROA/TSI being an attraction, then it losing its value.
Well I didn’t - I don’t have any specific memories of the rivers from my first visit as a kid. I remember riding the friendship boat at Epcot but not anything about the rivers.

My enjoyment of the Liberty Belle is my enjoyment of vintage transportation - specifically steam powered. The Disney parks are the only place in the country where steamboats and Steam trains pass.

it has nothing to do with nostalgia - it’s an actual key part of the appeal of the castle park experience.
 

lazyboy97o

Well-Known Member
Are they balking at the discussion of design or are they balking at how some people here cannot engage in that conversation without talking to people like they’re either stupid or careless? It’s pretty plain to me a good bit of the resistance some posters here get to their points is not the points themselves, rather it is how they are delivered. No one is going to want to have a good faith conversation with someone who seems incapable of being respectful. A lot of posters here seem to think they know best and love to lord that over everyone else.
You don’t have to respond if you don’t like how something is delivered, much less claim it’s just nostalgia and not worth discussing.
 

Dreamer19

Well-Known Member
That's not what the post I responded to was saying.

I'm not about to fall into your bait in which you want to make an argument on a different topic because that's one you think you can win.

Try defending that WDW is becoming like Six Flags.
Here’s a random six flags park map. I’m very interested to see what an average WDW park map looks like in a couple of years when all of these new “improvements” are made.

Is Disney becoming six flags? Not literally and no, figuratively it’s not falling to THAT level. I’m more hung up on theming and certainly quality of the overall experience.

Additionally, in regards to that quality drop - IMO a six flags would have an off-roading cars ride, you can get something like that in a lot of places. Being transported to the frontier? That is Disney.
 

Attachments

  • IMG_7177.jpeg
    IMG_7177.jpeg
    111 KB · Views: 19

Chi84

Premium Member
Recognizing your lack of concern is an insult?
No. But interpreting that as balking at nearly every discussion of design is not true.

I enjoy all the information you post here but you’re coming off a bit high-handed in this discussion.

We seem to be headed toward the same unproductive argument as yesterday.

People are going to have opinions that you consider baseless or uninformed. You’re not shy about pointing that out but maybe do it a bit more gently?
 

Mr. Sullivan

Well-Known Member
You don’t have to respond if you don’t like how something is delivered, much less claim it’s just nostalgia.
And you (not you specifically, the royal you) don’t have to jump into conversations with such a confrontational and negative energy. One cannot talk badly to a person and then get upset when that person doesn’t respond back kindly.

The burden of evading a bad interaction should not have to fall solely on the person that is talked to in an inappropriate way. No one here is better than anyone else. No one here’s opinion or point of view matters more than anyone else’s. Though some seem to think they are the smartest, and the best, and find it appropriate to look down their nose at others.

Those posters really need to start changing the way that they speak to people because it really is unacceptable, and it is what creates most of what they complain about where other posters are concerned. And I suspect if they do make that change, they’d find a lot more people who’re willing to engage with their points in a productive and interesting way.
 

Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.

Back
Top Bottom