Amen!
Disney is currently on a two-step process. Step 1: Become like Universal. Step 2: Become more like 6 Flags. The concept of themed lands, the entire basis upon which the parks were based, is being eroded away with the silt of the river.
Amen!
Disney is currently on a two-step process. Step 1: Become like Universal. Step 2: Become more like 6 Flags. The concept of themed lands, the entire basis upon which the parks were based, is being eroded away with the silt of the river.
Who decides how it’s acceptable for me to spend my money? You?Can we agree that an argument could be made that the standards have dropped and that should be classified as unacceptable for a family spending a decade of savings on an expected standard?
Once again, there are plenty of scenarios that could have been played out where the river could have stayed AND we could have gotten some great attractions and the park would have been better for it.Seems like a slippery slope falllacy. In no way is them taking away 14 acres for a low capacity attraction equivalent to them taking down something like Haunted Mansion or the castle both of which sell merchandise out of the park and are incredibly popular icons
Six flags and cedar fair actually merged and are 1 big company now... Hopefully the cedar fair brand drags the six flags parks up... and not the other way around.Six Flags and WDW are on two different levels.
Now, if you said Cedar Point, I would agree.
We all have our own opinions on what provides us with utility.
Amazing how despite other arguments people have to keep defaulting to blind nostalgia being the only thing.If you didn't grow up with LB/ROA/TSI being an attraction, then it losing its value. It was just there as we walked by. It's different when you lived it, and have fond memories. I do not. I have them for many other aspects of the parks.
You really cannot be serious with this Six FlagsAmen!
Disney is currently on a two-step process. Step 1: Become like Universal. Step 2: Become more like 6 Flags. The concept of themed lands, the entire basis upon which the parks were based, is being eroded away with the silt of the river.
Mr. Penguin, can you point to a cohesive them for any of the four parks?
It’s not synonymous but when people balk at nearly every discussion of design then it starts to suggest a lack of concern. “I don’t care. I don’t care. I don’t care. How dare you say I don’t care!”The idea I disagree with in the post I was responding to, and in other posts like it, is that not being particularly sad about this change is synonymous with a lack of regard for the more understated and nuanced things that make Disney what it is.
At the end of the day, subjectivity and feeling is the very core of this whole debate though. There is no objectively correct or incorrect response or feeling to this project. It can only come from what one feels.Amazing how despite other arguments people have to keep defaulting to blind nostalgia being the only thing.
That's not what the post I responded to was saying.Mr. Penguin, can you point to a cohesive them for any of the four parks?
Please don’t just post a picture of young Peter Quill in front of the Epcot ball.
Are they balking at the discussion of design or are they balking at how some people here cannot engage in that conversation without talking to people like they’re either stupid or careless? It’s pretty plain to me a good bit of the resistance some posters here get to their points is not the points themselves, rather it is how they are delivered. No one is going to want to have a good faith conversation with someone who seems incapable of being respectful. A lot of posters here seem to think they know best and love to lord that over everyone else.It’s not synonymous but when people balk at nearly every discussion of design then it starts to suggest a lack of concern. “I don’t care. I don’t care. I don’t care. How dare you say I don’t care!”
It’s easy. You don’t care about how some things affect the design (“I don’t care”) but you do care about others (“How dare you say I don’t care”).It’s not synonymous but when people balk at nearly every discussion of design then it starts to suggest a lack of concern. “I don’t care. I don’t care. I don’t care. How dare you say I don’t care!”
Well I didn’t - I don’t have any specific memories of the rivers from my first visit as a kid. I remember riding the friendship boat at Epcot but not anything about the rivers.If you didn't grow up with LB/ROA/TSI being an attraction, then it losing its value.
Recognizing your lack of concern is an insult?It’s easy. You don’t care about how some things affect the design (“I don’t care”) but you do care about others (“How dare you say I don’t care”).
You don’t have to respond if you don’t like how something is delivered, much less claim it’s just nostalgia and not worth discussing.Are they balking at the discussion of design or are they balking at how some people here cannot engage in that conversation without talking to people like they’re either stupid or careless? It’s pretty plain to me a good bit of the resistance some posters here get to their points is not the points themselves, rather it is how they are delivered. No one is going to want to have a good faith conversation with someone who seems incapable of being respectful. A lot of posters here seem to think they know best and love to lord that over everyone else.
Here’s a random six flags park map. I’m very interested to see what an average WDW park map looks like in a couple of years when all of these new “improvements” are made.That's not what the post I responded to was saying.
I'm not about to fall into your bait in which you want to make an argument on a different topic because that's one you think you can win.
Try defending that WDW is becoming like Six Flags.
No. But interpreting that as balking at nearly every discussion of design is not true.Recognizing your lack of concern is an insult?
Absolutely. Using a bit of hyperbole but yo understood my perspective.Six Flags and WDW are on two different levels.
Now, if you said Cedar Point, I would agree.
And you (not you specifically, the royal you) don’t have to jump into conversations with such a confrontational and negative energy. One cannot talk badly to a person and then get upset when that person doesn’t respond back kindly.You don’t have to respond if you don’t like how something is delivered, much less claim it’s just nostalgia.
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.