• The new WDWMAGIC iOS app is here!
    Stay up to date with the latest Disney news, photos, and discussions right from your iPhone. The app is free to download and gives you quick access to news articles, forums, photo galleries, park hours, weather and Lightning Lane pricing. Learn More
  • Welcome to the WDWMAGIC.COM Forums!
    Please take a look around, and feel free to sign up and join the community.

MK Piston Peak and Villains Land Construction Thread

Incomudro

Well-Known Member
Agreed. How can we say it’s shoehorned in when they bulldozed everything? If they were trying to build a rapids ride on top of Tom Sawyer Island, it’d be shoehorned in. But, clearing several acres down to dirt and building something new is a custom build. It’s not unlike what they did to build MK in the 1960s/70s.
It's shoehorned in because viewing a Piston Peak from the distance of Frontierland was not a plan from the outset.
It may - and I hope it does - turn out great, especially given what was taken way.
 

_caleb

Well-Known Member
I wasn’t talking about the retaining wall… The entire landscape barrier functions as a solid edge condition.
I see.

I guess it's difficult for me to read the elevations in the aerial images. I thought they were essentially sinking the river below approach grade and building the Piston Peak area up into a "mountain." This would make the "mountain" seem taller and add depth of terrain to the "National Park" area.

I totally agree that if the whole thing amounts to a barrier to create discrete areas in a small space, that's going to be bad. I'll be interested in how they manage transitions between the themed areas converging here.
 

James Alucobond

Well-Known Member
Is it possible they're going to backfill the near side of that retaining wall to the height of the wall?

In other words, the wall is to hold dirt, not to block view?
I'm not exactly sure why they'd want to do that. Fill it to the level of the rest of Frontierland, sure, but the purpose of the rockwork ringing the area is to hide the cars from the areas where they're not temporally appropriate.
 

Incomudro

Well-Known Member
isn't that true of everything?

Would you say the designed pandora for it's space after the fact?
No.
It isn't true of the Magic Kingdom (or any of the other parks) where sight lines, structures etc., were all planned to work cohesively as part of the original plans.
Frontierland, Libert Square etc., were planed with a river and a boat, as was the location of Haunted Mansion.
Now that is removed, and a mountainous structure is being constructed where one wasn't.
Now... As a counter to my argument Splash wasn't always at MK and it worked great where they fit it.
Though... Splash was a smaller mountain than Piston Peak is meant to portray.
We'll have to see.
I'm hoping for the best.
 

Incomudro

Well-Known Member
Pandora didn’t have to fit within such a small area. So no.

7 dwarves mine train did - but of course that was cut down because of budget not a space issue.
Exactly.
Pandora had the blessing of space.
Plenty of room to work the perspectives, forced and otherwise.
Same with Galaxy's Edge.
 

DrStarlander

Well-Known Member
When you walk through Adventureland, you have the structures (F&B, shopping) on one side, the walkway, and the then "the wilds" (the jungle) off to the other side, stretching as far as your imagination goes. You feel surrounded by the theme.

With redeveloping Rivers of America (not something I wanted), they had the opportunity in Frontierland to create "the wilds" where the river is (which the RoA/TSI already was, but achieve that again but with an E-ticket). This could have been thematically tied to the Frontierland setting/buildings, and accessed from that (an attraction).

Instead, they are putting a figurative, if not literal, wall up around this RoA area, turning their back on Frontierland (giving up on it?), and guests will access this walled-off cul de sac zone from near Haunted Mansion.

It will be interesting to see how it turns out but I can't help think they missed a huge opportunity, and by turning their back on Frontierland proper have foreclosed any future where Frontierland proper achieves greater -- rather than less -- purpose or relevance.
 

DCLcruiser

Well-Known Member
No.
It isn't true of the Magic Kingdom (or any of the other parks) where sight lines, structures etc., were all planned to work cohesively as part of the original plans.
Frontierland, Libert Square etc., were planed with a river and a boat, as was the location of Haunted Mansion.
Now that is removed, and a mountainous structure is being constructed where one wasn't.
Now... As a counter to my argument Splash wasn't always at MK and it worked great where they fit it.
Though... Splash was a smaller mountain than Piston Peak is meant to portray.
We'll have to see.
I'm hoping for the best.
All I will say is that at DCA, the Grizzly Peak area is very well hidden and seamless. Now, I’m sure someone can post a picture from a point where it messed up a sightline, but as a guest, I found it to be very well themed and hidden.

So, there is hope.
 

Tha Realest

Well-Known Member
Yeah, I'm gonna go there ~ the same was assumed about TBA.
I don’t doubt any of the creators really wanted to make a great attraction. It’s entirely possible to be really passionate about something and not very good at it. For example:
1773950394557.jpeg
 

Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.

Back
Top Bottom