TrainsOfDisney
Well-Known Member
When did the meets start in world showcase?If meet and greets and disney influence makes WS unserious then it hasn’t been serious since the mid 80s.
When did the meets start in world showcase?If meet and greets and disney influence makes WS unserious then it hasn’t been serious since the mid 80s.
Mid-80s when Eisner was in charge. But the characters were typically dressed in appropriate attire that fit the themes of each pavilion.When did the meets start in world showcase?
I’ve often said that JII and Horizons were the heart and soul of EPCOT Center. Not that I don’t still enjoy the last two originals but it hasn’t been the same in what feels like forever.Keeping WoM and Horizons would have gone a long way towards keeping enough of the old Epcot alive.
The other major factor was that the timing was perfect. After the more downtrodden vibe of the 70s, America was moving into the much more optimistic 80s. The park solidified a vision that human ingenuity and technology were taking us into a better era and exciting future. I was truly captivated as a child there, particularly by Future World.
Def a big part of the heart & soul that are missing. It’d add SO much more balance back to the park just by bringing those 2 attractions back while tastefully enhancing them w new tech & spfx. Like The American Adventure for instance. That was updated tastefully.I’ve often said that JII and Horizons were the heart and soul of EPCOT Center. Not that I don’t still enjoy the last two originals but it hasn’t been the same in what feels like forever.
There is no "big part" - They were the heart and soul of EPCOT Center. The park, as it was originally designed and built, died when they were removed.Def a big part of the heart & soul that are missing. It’d add SO much more balance back to the park just by bringing those 2 attractions back while tastefully enhancing them w new tech & spfx. Like The American Adventure for instance. That was updated tastefully.
Iger learned completely the wrong lesson from the DCA re-do. The original incarnation failed because it was essentially Six Flags on a Disney budget. It wasn't because of lack of characters and IP and as I have said a thousand times Cars Land was successful because even if the Cars characters never appeared in the land at all it would still work as a nostalgic route 66 tribute whether it was tied to an IP or not and that's why what is happening at MK's Frontierland (assuming it will still be called that) is so misguided never mind whatever the other three parks are supposed to be right now.To think they thought EPCOT needed a DCA / WDSP style complete makeover. And to add insult to injury replaced it with garbage too.
Or being in an abusive relationship.Until then, Disney could do no wrong with me, an untouchable institute 4until well into my adulthood. Like having to watch your childhood idol turn into a substance abuser.
Exactly, it was one thing to have the characters meeting and greeting outside in the park. Having them actually IN the attractions on the other hand. The only time the IP formula worked really was ironically "Circle of Life" since it supported the overall theme of the pavilion and it was one part of a larger concept unlike what Nemo did to the Seas eleven years later. The irony of the fact that Circle of Life ended up being replaced with the non-IP "Awesome Planet is quite amusing given the overall direction of the park right now.Mid-80s when Eisner was in charge. But the characters were typically dressed in appropriate attire that fit the themes of each pavilion.
That was a large part in the downfall of pretty much all the secondary parks.Is there love for any Disney park in the media that doesn't have a castle in it?
That's worthy of a thread. Or a Disney book.That was a large part in the downfall of pretty much all the secondary parks.
Getting too serious for a Disney gà board!Or being in an abusive relationship.
While there is exactly zero chance they bring back my beloved WoM or Horizons (I am not even confident the current crop of imagineers are capable of building that level of animatronic scale in consistent working order), it is at least not out of the realm of possibility they revamp Imagination to something closer to the spirit of the original. If they decide to keep the pavilion theme/Figment, it does open that door for this, as Dr Channing will definitely be pushed into a long overdue forced retirement.I've heard it said that Journey Into Imagination was the one ride in the pre-1990s EPCOT that felt timeless and would still hold up today with minimal updates.
For DCA the reason is obvious. The others, not so much.That's worthy of a thread. Or a Disney book.
Of the six non-castle parks, four within fifteen or so years of opening had a complete make-over and rebranding. Three even being renamed and rethemed. Why?
Oh, trust me. There are FAR more important things I worry about on a daily basis these days.Getting too serious for a Disney gà board!
Good for a healthy sense of perspective though. If I'm traumatised, well into my twenties, by my favourite theme park being changed, then I grew up sheltered and protected. First World problems.
I am actually somewhat optimistic about the possibility of a better Imagination in the vein of the original. It would be far easier to market to the average consumer these days than something niche though great like Horizons or WOM.While there is exactly zero chance they bring back my beloved WoM or Horizons (I am not even confident the current crop of imagineers are capable of building that level of animatronic scale in consistent working order), it is at least not out of the realm of possibility they revamp Imagination to something closer to the spirit of the original. If they decide to keep the pavilion theme/Figment, it does open that door for this, as Dr Channing will definitely be pushed into a long overdue forced retirement.

Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.