• The new WDWMAGIC iOS app is here!
    Stay up to date with the latest Disney news, photos, and discussions right from your iPhone. The app is free to download and gives you quick access to news articles, forums, photo galleries, park hours, weather and Lightning Lane pricing. Learn More
  • Welcome to the WDWMAGIC.COM Forums!
    Please take a look around, and feel free to sign up and join the community.

News Jill Estorino Named President of Disneyland Resort

DrStarlander

Well-Known Member
The Funworld article could provide some insight on Disneyland's future:

#1
The wide expansion taking place across Disney’s parks in Asia and Europe began with research. Estorino says the first step when planning for growth is understanding what the consumer wants— and how that varies by market...
Some of the biggest missteps at DLR are because the company pursued projects that the consumer didn't want -- or projects the consumer could've wanted but were pursued in ways they didn't want. SWGE being based on the Sequel Trilogy (and omitting the previous films and characters at the heart of the fandom); Tiana's Bayou Adventure being about the operator of a food co-op who needs a band for a party (and omitting nearly all elements and key characters at the heart of the story); Avenger's Campus looking like an Irvine office park with a sub-par Spider-Man attraction (and omitting the fantasy and thrills of the IP); and even the Madame Leota gift shop (a cheap building in front of the Haunted Mansion was not at all desired by fans).

Looking forward, there's a question whether DLR visitors "want" Avatar. And do they want it as an adjunct to 1920's Hollywood. It's probably too late for that to be redirected.

But the past ten years of development at DLR have largely evidenced a disregard for what fans of the various IPs would want had they bothered to ask them. The new offerings have felt like force-feedings. Corporate agenda first, consumer wants second. Maybe that will change moving forward. I would really love to know she is spending a lot of time with different groups of DLR fans and visitors and figuring out what they truly want.

#2
...In China, for example, Shanghai Disneyland sees high attendance from young adults.

“The young adult female has taken hold of this brand and of this park, and they’re creating a sophisticated energy inside the park,” Estorino shares. “They bring their fashion sensibility, their modern perspectives, and their technology capability. The park has become not only a backdrop for their WeChat, but they’re also creating a vibe in the park.”

As part of understanding what DLR visitors want, I'm not going be surprised to see more bars and lounges. The DLR visitor profile is unique in terms of being a significantly locals parks with a hang-out culture.

Or instead of weaving this element into the current parks more, especially Disneyland itself, the food-and-wine crowd could influence what happens at the Toy Story lot as well -- e.g., something akin to World Showcase could be possible.

But I also think she will look at who is not enamored with DLR: The theme park "tweener" market is key. And by that I don't mean the consumer products term of between kids and teenagers, I mean between being a bright-eyed and wonder-filled child being brought to Disneyland by parents, and being an adult, perhaps a Disney Adult, or just an adult with young children, paying to visit or bring your own kids there. This chasm between -- the teens and twenties years -- is a lost era. They once targeted this age with projects like Videopolis or California Screamin'. Their efforts sometimes reeking of pandering and clumsiness. But choosing to not have any mid-thrill themed coasters at DCA, for example, especially in Avenger's Campus (while Estorino oversees a Spider-Man coster for Shanghai) is a huge miss in keeping these tweeners engaged.

#3
Estorino tells Funworld that the second step when planning an expansion is looking at operational and financial goals.

“We may have operational needs we want to address, such as improving navigation or spreading demand across the resort. There may be financial goals or new commercial ideas we're trying to drive. So, it's a combination between what the consumer wants and desires as well as what the operation and business needs,” she says.

This is precisely where things have been out of balance in the past decade (see #1 above). Simply, it's been too much about "commercial ideas we are trying to drive." That language alone -- drive -- should raise red flags. Disney needs to know when they are pushing some agenda, the audience can tell. And usually resents it. It's an old fashioned way of doing business and they need to instead start figuring out where their agenda and customer wants intersect. In that intersection there is plenty to accomplish to achieve resonance, loyalty, and success.

#4
“We do our due diligence on the front end and really understand which stories are going to resonate, and sometimes, we do miss the mark. I would say that’s rare, but we are quick to change when our guests and our operations are feeling that we either need to evolve the story that we introduced or bring in a new story. We’re not afraid to do that,” she says.

Great. DLR is a target-rich environment for evolving stories or in which to replace ill-conceived stories.

#5
Estorino believes waiting six months for sharing opinions after a project is complete is not beneficial.

“I’ve thought a lot about that over the years, and I can say that’s part of my leadership style. I have found that voice to provide feedback—and timely feedback,” she says.

How does she gauge success? It, in part, goes back to connecting with the heartware.

“I would say our guests and our cast tell us in surveys whether we’re successful or not,” she says. “It’s beyond business, creativity, and innovation; rather, how our guests and our cast are responding to what we’re doing.”

“I always think about my visceral response when I see something creative or innovative. Did it get me here?” she says, holding a hand over her heart. “Did I have that lump in my throat? Did I have that stir in my belly? Did it move me emotionally— even for just a second or two? That’s instinct and intuition.”


Indeed, too many of the recent projects at DLR fail to cause a visceral response. If you are in a land or on a ride based on an IP you love, and you feel nothing, that's failure. It's a waste of hard-earned emotional equity. Obviously they need to do better moving forward. And they need to change the business and creative culture for that to happen. They need to stay truer to the IPs fans love -- that doesn't mean everything needs to be a book-report, it just means we're not looking for entirely new takes on the IPs when at the parks. Fans are looking to rekindle and re-feel their existing, even if sometimes latent, love of the IPs.

And when they get something wrong, they ought to be quicker about fixing it. Humility is a trait not associated with the Disney company. The reluctance to change course and reboot comes off as unempathetic and belligerent. So they let wounds fester. I like hearing a bit of impatience from Estorino and hope she takes a hard look at recent-past projects as they could be greatly improved.

#6
She is particularly interested in assisting rising talent in their professional journeys. Mentoring is a space Estorino has leaned into, and in the past five years, she’s crafted initiatives focused on developing women at Disney’s international properties through formal and informal mentorship.

For example, Estorino recently began accepting requests for 15-minute career navigation conversations with any Disney cast member from across the organization.

“If anyone sends me a note wanting a 15-minute career conversation, I accept it.

It’s a recent phenomenon,” she says with enthusiasm.


This is cool. And it's valuable because she has a lot of experience. But she can't do all the mentoring at Disney, and if they continue to get rid of old-timers, the up-and-coming people will be underserved. They need to put a value on experience and find a way to retain that and use it effectively.
 
Last edited:

britain

Well-Known Member
The Funworld article could provide some insight on Disneyland's future:

#1
The wide expansion taking place across Disney’s parks in Asia and Europe began with research. Estorino says the first step when planning for growth is understanding what the consumer wants— and how that varies by market...
Some of the biggest missteps at DLR are because the company pursued projects that the consumer didn't want -- or projects the consumer could've wanted but were pursued in ways they didn't want. SWGE being based on the Sequel Trilogy (and omitting the previous films and characters at the heart of the fandom); Tiana's Bayou Adventure being about the operator of a food co-op who needs a band for a party (and omitting nearly all elements and key characters at the heart of the story); Avenger's Campus looking like an Irvine office park with a sub-par Spider-Man attraction (and omitting the fantasy and thrills of the IP); and even the Madame Leota gift shop (a cheap building in front of the Haunted Mansion was not at all desired by fans).

Looking forward, there's a question whether DLR visitors "want" Avatar. And do they want it as an adjunct to 1920's Hollywood. It's probably too late for that to be redirected.

But the past ten years of development at DLR have largely evidenced a disregard for what fans of the various IPs would want had they bothered to ask them. The new offerings have felt like force-feedings. Corporate agenda first, consumer wants second. Maybe that will change moving forward. I would really love to know she is spending a lot of time with different groups of DLR fans and visitors and figuring out what they truly want.

This is potentially good, but at the same time she could be talking about "what do people who don't currently come to our parks want to see in order to make them want to come?"

I'm sure she understands that one in the hand is worth two in the bush, but causing DL fans that keep coming anyway to be somewhat disgruntled with changes might be damage they are willing to take to attract more customers.
 

TP2000

Well-Known Member
This is potentially good, but at the same time she could be talking about "what do people who don't currently come to our parks want to see in order to make them want to come?"

I'm sure she understands that one in the hand is worth two in the bush, but causing DL fans that keep coming anyway to be somewhat disgruntled with changes might be damage they are willing to take to attract more customers.

Exactly.

Also, don't forget, she reports to at least two bosses; Parks Chairman and Company CEO.

And when the current Company CEO (D'Amaro) was Parks Chairman, he recently decided to bulldoze WDW's Rivers of America for a smaller version of Cars Land with only two rides.

Let's not pretend Ms. Estorino, with her pitch-perfect corporate executive vocabulary and slickness and who has never worked at Disneyland before, is going to stand up to a boss who says "Estorino, start delegating on this plan to turn Main Street USA into Mickey Avenue for Fiscal '28".
 

DrStarlander

Well-Known Member
Let's not pretend Ms. Estorino, with her pitch-perfect corporate executive vocabulary and slickness and who has never worked at Disneyland before...
I'm seeing a lot of critique of what she looks like, her vocabulary, "slickness" (what the hell are you talking about, this is an executive at a $100 billion publicly-traded company. If you want folksy go down to your local mini-golf). And how many park chiefs "worked at Disneyland" in recent decades?

I'm smelling gender bias under all this BS. If you've got a beef with actual decisions you know she's made, start focusing on that and let's discuss them.
 

britain

Well-Known Member
I'm seeing a lot of critique of what she looks like, her vocabulary, "slickness" (what the hell are you talking about, this is an executive at a $100 billion publicly-traded company. If you want folksy go down to your local mini-golf). And how many park chiefs "worked at Disneyland" in recent decades?

I'm smelling gender bias under all this BS. If you've got a beef with actual decisions you know she's made, start focusing on that and let's discuss them.

You may have a point, but in fairness to TP, I’d call Iger quite folksy compared to D’Amaro.
 

TP2000

Well-Known Member
I'm seeing a lot of critique of what she looks like,

I'm not sure what you're talking about.

The only observation made on her visual appearance so far is that she is a white lady, which was made in an aside about why she would be an executive leader for the "Black consumer experience". It's more a valid criticism of modern American corporations, not her specifically. She's just along for the HR approved ride on that one.

her vocabulary,

Vocabulary matters. It's why the CEO of McDonald's recently went viral and trolled mercilessly for calling his new hamburger a "product" instead of just saying hamburger. "I love this product." And the world laughed at him for days. 🤣

"slickness" (what the hell are you talking about, this is an executive at a $100 billion publicly-traded company. If you want folksy go down to your local mini-golf).

We don't have any information on how she acts in real life yet. There's no video or first-hand accounts of her personal style, so all we have to go on is her rather formulaic interview with a fawning reporter from a trade magazine. She seems very slick in that.

Slick isn't a bad thing, if it can be paired with genuineness. Josh D'Amaro was a slick guy, but he also seemed real and genuine, so that just added to his positive aura with fans. Let's see if there's realness behind Ms. Estorino's slickness, or if it's just corporate buzzwords and babble with no real substance.

And how many park chiefs "worked at Disneyland" in recent decades?

I think the Parks Chairman role was first created for Paul Pressler circa 1998, so it's a new phenom. It goes about as well as you'd expect it to, with results from deadly and disastrous (1998-2003) to surprisingly effective (2012-2015).

The last true Disneylander who worked his way up from ride operator to executive was John Storbeck. But he was fired by Michael Colglazier (see my previous accounts of charity do's with him and his boring-as-dishwater wife), who was a real snob. And Colglazier was subsequently fired by Josh D'Amaro, after Josh leapfrogged him for the Parks Chairman role.

I'm smelling gender bias under all this BS. If you've got a beef with actual decisions you know she's made, start focusing on that and let's discuss them.

That doesn't work any more. When presented with commentary or observations you don't like, you can't accuse the world of being ists and phobes to shut them up. That stopped working several years ago now. There is no gender bias here. We have excoriated TDA Presidents Du Jour in this forum for decades, both men and women. We have also praised the ones who turned out to be fabulous.

If you have personal experience working with Ms. Estorino and are a big fan of hers, please let us know! She may turn out to be great. We just don't know yet.

But from the interviews and corporate communications released on her behalf so far, she seems like a run-of-the-mill senior executive from Any Company, USA who uses pre-approved phrasing and could be selling tires or toothpaste or theme parks.

For the good of Disneyland, I hope she turns out to be great! So far, though... 🤔
 

DrStarlander

Well-Known Member
You may have a point, but in fairness to TP, I’d call Iger quite folksy compared to D’Amaro.
In fairness to women executives, men have had the luxury of being folksy and still being taken seriously. Try that at the "manager" level of a big company as a woman and see if you can get to the highest executive levels. I'm not even an activist around this issue and the bias is so obvious.
I'm not sure what you're talking about.

The only observation made on her visual appearance so far is that she is a white lady, which was made in an aside about why she would be an executive leader for the "Black consumer experience". It's more a valid criticism of modern American corporations, not her specifically. She's just along for the HR approved ride on that one.



Vocabulary matters. It's why the CEO of McDonald's recently went viral and trolled mercilessly for calling his new hamburger a "product" instead of just saying hamburger. "I love this product." And the world laughed at him for days. 🤣



We don't have any information on how she acts in real life yet. There's no video or first-hand accounts of her personal style, so all we have to go on is her rather formulaic interview with a fawning reporter from a trade magazine. She seems very slick in that.

Slick isn't a bad thing, if it can be paired with genuineness. Josh D'Amaro was a slick guy, but he also seemed real and genuine, so that just added to his positive aura with fans. Let's see if there's realness behind Ms. Estorino's slickness, or if it's just corporate buzzwords and babble with no real substance.



I think the Parks Chairman role was first created for Paul Pressler circa 1998, so it's a new phenom. It goes about as well as you'd expect it to, with results from deadly and disastrous (1998-2003) to surprisingly effective (2012-2015).

The last true Disneylander who worked his way up from ride operator to executive was John Storbeck. But he was fired by Michael Colglazier (see my previous accounts of charity do's with him and his boring-as-dishwater wife), who was a real snob. And Colglazier was subsequently fired by Josh D'Amaro, after Josh leapfrogged him for the Parks Chairman role.



That doesn't work any more. When presented with commentary or observations you don't like, you can't accuse the world of being ists and phobes to shut them up. That stopped working several years ago now. There is no gender bias here. We have excoriated TDA Presidents Du Jour in this forum for decades, both men and women. We have also praised the ones who turned out to be fabulous.

If you have personal experience working with Ms. Estorino and are a big fan of hers, please let us know! She may turn out to be great. We just don't know yet.

But from the interviews and corporate communications released on her behalf so far, she seems like a run-of-the-mill senior executive from Any Company, USA who uses pre-approved phrasing and could be selling tires or toothpaste or theme parks.

For the good of Disneyland, I hope she turns out to be great! So far, though... 🤔
You gave away your bias against and fixation with her gender right off the bat with your first comment...
A new TDA President Du Jour! And a lady, this time. I think this makes her only the 3rd lady President in Disneyland history?

How many Churros do we have on her staying longer than 18 months? With her stodgy corporate background with decades solely in marketing and "brand stewardship" (what the heck is that?), I'm betting she doesn't last long. Perhaps longer than the previous lady who Instagrammed herself routinely but only lasted six months or so, but probably not the full 3 year gig.

I can't imagine she's going to want to get out there and pretend to be friends, much less feign actual interest in their job duties, with the working class CM's she now leads. Or even their Dockers-clad managers. Just by going off her head shot and pre-scrubbed bio that obviously downplays her lifelong job in Marketing and pretends she knows anything about Operations or Hospitality.

I'll bet 2 Churros she doesn't last longer than 18 months. And I'll bet 5 Churros she's not there two years from now.

You're up, Jill! 🥳
You group her with other women who have had the role as if they are some sort of meaningful cohort (which they aren't, other than their gender). You mention multiple times photos of her as if what she looks like is important. Then went on to ridicule her early career, using the outdated term "manageress" to drive the gender bias home.
I wonder if Ms. Estorino was ever a travel agent? Or if she just started as a manageress or some sort of cushy marketing gig. I'd like her more right off the bat if we could find a circa 1991 picture of her looking like this... 🤣
Then you suggest you'd like her more if you could see a photo of her when she was younger?

Your statement of "That doesn't work any more. When presented with commentary or observations you don't like, you can't accuse the world of being ists and phobes to shut them up" is wrong. You got the wrong message the past few years. Sexism is still sexism, even now. Sorry.
 
Last edited:

Disney Irish

Premium Member
I'm seeing a lot of critique of what she looks like, her vocabulary, "slickness" (what the hell are you talking about, this is an executive at a $100 billion publicly-traded company. If you want folksy go down to your local mini-golf). And how many park chiefs "worked at Disneyland" in recent decades?

I'm smelling gender bias under all this BS. If you've got a beef with actual decisions you know she's made, start focusing on that and let's discuss them.
Welcome to "TP" speak, he's been called out for this before, he just laughs it off and says its how "his generation" speaks.
 

TP2000

Well-Known Member
You gave away your bias against and fixation with her gender right off the bat with your first comment...

You group her with other women who have had the role as if they are some sort of meaningful cohort (which they aren't, other than their gender). You mention multiple times photos of her as if what she looks like is important. Then went on to ridicule her early career, using the outdated term "manageress" to drive the gender bias home.

This is just silly. She's a woman, and I bet she's also a lady. She looks nice, quite frankly.

Did you miss all the references to Josh D'Amaro's tight pants, winning smile, and runners physique the past 8 years? :cool:

So, you don't want to acknowledge that she is a woman, and is not a man. Got it. And yet, I don't get it at all.

Then you suggest you'd like her more if you could see a photo of her when she was younger?

Nope, not at all. You are either being purposely misleading, or you simply didn't get it.

I would find her career story more fun and interesting if she started as a travel agent in '91 and she could laugh at herself with a photo of her fabulous 1990's hairdo sitting at a clunky computer. It would humanize a person to know they started out like so many of us did, instead of just being birthed from a corporate embryo in a sterile HR lab as a "senior thought leader".

Jill Estorino started in 1991 in Travel Sales at WDW. It would be fabulous to know she had this going on for her then...

Screenshot 2026-03-10 8.03.58 PM.png


You statement of "That doesn't work any more. When presented with commentary or observations you don't like, you can't accuse the world of being ists and phobes to shut them up" is wrong. You got the wrong message the past few years. Sexism is still sexism, even now. Sorry.

Women are not exempt from valid criticism in the workplace. If we could criticize Paul Pressler and Ed Grier and Jay Rasulo and Tom Staggs (and we did, endlessly for years!) then we can criticize a woman in that same role if there is valid criticism to be had.

Women are not fragile flowers that you aren't allowed to criticize or comment on. To do that is the soft prejudice of lowered expectations and extra protections for a specific gender.

Ms. Estorino is clearly an intelligent person, or she wouldn't have gotten where she is. But so far, all of her public statements about her leadership and job duties read like HR gobbledygook that makes most people's eyes roll. :rolleyes:

Let's see what she says and how she says it in her first interview as TDA President. Maybe the IAAPA trade magazine reporter did her no favors in presenting her as a corporate automaton. God knows any "journalist" who actually writes a paragraph like this is fairly cringey...

"Sitting across from Estorino during a conversation on the state of the industry is like attending a masterclass. She holds eye contact and inserts your name into the conversation to affirm she is engaged with the dialogue."
 

TP2000

Well-Known Member
Welcome to "TP" speak, he's been called out for this before, he just laughs it off and says its how "his generation" speaks.

A woman in a senior executive role is not exempt from commentary or even criticism, based solely on what she says in pre-approved media releases.

That is all we have been discussing here. Also a passing reference to the fact that she is not a man, she is a woman. And a lady at that.

I look forward to her first interview with the OC Register. I hope she can drop some of the corporate HR-speak she used with that industry trade paper. It might be acceptable in that type of format, but for the general local newspaper she needs to tone down the corporate gobbledygook and HR phrasing.

She's not a tax attorney for gosh sakes, she's in charge of Disneyland! Fun! Rides! Fireworks! Dancing! Laughter!
 

TP2000

Well-Known Member
You were sexist. And you were called out. And your own gobbledygook can't hide it.

Calling a woman a woman is not sexist. My posts stand on their own here. Go read them again, if you'd like.

When the first female astronaut lands on the moon in a few years, and we all celebrate as she plants the next American flag for us there, are you going to be able to admit she's a woman?
 

TP2000

Well-Known Member
Let's do a recap of where we are with the Hall Of TDA Presidents, now that Ms. Estorino has joined the cast on stage.

The first person to hold the title of "President" of Disneyland was the late, great Jack Lindquist. He got that role in 1990, but prior to that it was always a grab bag of "Parks Committee" joint leaders for both coasts. Dick Nunis was in charge of the Parks as a whole for a time in the 1980's and 90's, as the first of what we would now call Parks Chairman.

But for Disneyland President's specifically, it's gone like this...

Jack Lindquist: End Of Last Ice Age to 1994 (true Disneylander, and a helluva good storyteller!)
Paul Pressler: 1994-1998 (came from Disney Store, promoted to Parks Chairman)
Cynthia Harriss: 1998-2003 (resigned suddenly after several deaths to "spend more time with family")
Matt Ouimet: 2003-2006 (saved Disneyland for the 50th, resigned after being passed over for promotion)
Ed Grier: 2006-2009 (no known personality, "retired" and yet still works in Higher Education out East)
George Kalogridis: 2009-2013 (saved DCA and rebuilt the Resort, started as a busboy at WDW in '71!)
Michael Colglazer: 2013-2018 (went to war with the City of Anaheim, a real snob, eventually fired by D'Amaro)
Josh D'Amaro: 2018-2019 (a fan favorite, winning smile, runner's physique, has a great tailor for his pants)
Rebecca Cambpell: 2019-2020 (she lasted less than a year, but Instagrammed the hell out of it)
Ken Potrock: 2020-2025 (sort of the unknown guy, lateral move to Major Events President)
Thomas Mazloum: 2025-2026 (that was fast! promoted to Parks Chairman. great wardrobe!)
Jill Estorino: 2026-20?? (been in Marketing her whole life. also rumored to be a woman. what is a woman?)

I hadn't realized Mr. Potrock was in there for as long as he was! Covid really screwed that up (see: Rebecca Campbell), but he stuck around for about as long as anyone.

Otherwise, it was about as I expected in hindsight. A few hits, a few total disasters, but mostly middling status quo.
 

denyuntilcaught

Well-Known Member
To reiterate what others have said - they rotate folks (both men and women...) out of this role too quickly to make an impact.

Thanks to TP for the timeline, it's easy to tell that Josh, Rebecca, and Thomas each were rotated far too soon, IMO regardless of performance. A vision for the resort doesn't matter if you don't have enough time to implement it.
 
Last edited:

TP2000

Well-Known Member
To reiterate what others have said - they rotate folks (both men and women...) out of this role too quickly to make an impact.

Careful, if you admit that some are men and some are women, you'll be labeled a sexist and banned from the Faculty Lounge. ;)

Thanks to TP for the timeline, it's easy to tell that Josh, Rebecca, and Thomas each were rotated far too soon, IMO regardless of performance. Regardless of their visions, you need longer than a year to implement it.

I'd be willing to give Rebecca a pass because of Covid, but then she did all that Instagramming and it seemed silly. And cringey. No matter, as of '23 she is no longer providing services to The Walt Disney Company.

Thomas Mazloum clearly was on a short list for the Parks Chairman role when he was made Disneyland President, as Iger was already known to be near retirement when Mr. Mazloum was moved to Anaheim. He needed actual Park experience ASAP before he could be moved up. There was a strategy and plan there.

Josh came from being the VP of Animal Kingdom to be the President of Disneyland Resort, a promotion. But as you say, he moved up very fast. He was clearly a favorite of Iger and the Board. I can't say I fault them, he seems about as good as they get nowadays when it comes to senior executives. And he had the good sense to fire Colglazier and sent him packing.

Josh's decision to bulldoze the Rivers of America at WDW for Cars Land Lite is idiotic. But... at least he's not a snob.
 

Disney Irish

Premium Member
A woman in a senior executive role is not exempt from commentary or even criticism, based solely on what she says in pre-approved media releases.

That is all we have been discussing here. Also a passing reference to the fact that she is not a man, she is a woman. And a lady at that.

I look forward to her first interview with the OC Register. I hope she can drop some of the corporate HR-speak she used with that industry trade paper. It might be acceptable in that type of format, but for the general local newspaper she needs to tone down the corporate gobbledygook and HR phrasing.

She's not a tax attorney for gosh sakes, she's in charge of Disneyland! Fun! Rides! Fireworks! Dancing! Laughter!
I'm not going to get into this with you again as you never think you do anything wrong.

Clearly many posters aren't fond of how you speak about people and roles in certain ways, this is just the latest example. Maybe since it keeps getting called out its something you may want to think about.
 

CoastalElite64

Well-Known Member
Let's do a recap of where we are with the Hall Of TDA Presidents, now that Ms. Estorino has joined the cast on stage.

The first person to hold the title of "President" of Disneyland was the late, great Jack Lindquist. He got that role in 1990, but prior to that it was always a grab bag of "Parks Committee" joint leaders for both coasts. Dick Nunis was in charge of the Parks as a whole for a time in the 1980's and 90's, as the first of what we would now call Parks Chairman.

But for Disneyland President's specifically, it's gone like this...

Jack Lindquist: End Of Last Ice Age to 1994 (true Disneylander, and a helluva good storyteller!)
Paul Pressler: 1994-1998 (came from Disney Store, promoted to Parks Chairman)
Cynthia Harriss: 1998-2003 (resigned suddenly after several deaths to "spend more time with family")
Matt Ouimet: 2003-2006 (saved Disneyland for the 50th, resigned after being passed over for promotion)
Ed Grier: 2006-2009 (no known personality, "retired" and yet still works in Higher Education out East)
George Kalogridis: 2009-2013 (saved DCA and rebuilt the Resort, started as a busboy at WDW in '71!)
Michael Colglazer: 2013-2018 (went to war with the City of Anaheim, a real snob, eventually fired by D'Amaro)
Josh D'Amaro: 2018-2019 (a fan favorite, winning smile, runner's physique, has a great tailor for his pants)
Rebecca Cambpell: 2019-2020 (she lasted less than a year, but Instagrammed the hell out of it)
Ken Potrock: 2020-2025 (sort of the unknown guy, lateral move to Major Events President)
Thomas Mazloum: 2025-2026 (that was fast! promoted to Parks Chairman. great wardrobe!)
Jill Estorino: 2026-20?? (been in Marketing her whole life. also rumored to be a woman. what is a woman?)

I hadn't realized Mr. Potrock was in there for as long as he was! Covid really screwed that up (see: Rebecca Campbell), but he stuck around for about as long as anyone.

Otherwise, it was about as I expected in hindsight. A few hits, a few total disasters, but mostly middling status quo.

I've never heard of her before. Has anyone?

I hope she's good for DL for everyones sake.
 

TP2000

Well-Known Member
I'm not going to get into this with you again as you never think you do anything wrong.

Clearly many posters aren't fond of how you speak about people and roles in certain ways, this is just the latest example. Maybe since it keeps getting called out its something you may want to think about.

Using the handy quote feature here, please quote the sentences you find offensive or inappropriate in this thread.

Then I'll consider it.

Until then.... Jill Estorino, Disneyland Resort President, is still a woman. The previous one was a man.
 

TP2000

Well-Known Member
I've never heard of her before. Has anyone?

I hope she's good for DL for everyones sake.

No, I don't think any of us have ever heard of her. I certainly haven't, and I know too many names already.

A quick search of the archived forums here shows that the name "Jill Estorino" has never been mentioned on this website before yesterday afternoon, when @DCBaker kindly started this thread. She's a complete unknown. Like a rolling stone.

Which then answers the question why several folks here would go try to find out information about her, like that recent puff piece she did for an industry trade magazine. Other than that, and her corporate bio page, we're flying blind on Ms. Estorino and her potential impact to Disneyland. Although rumor has it she's a woman.
 

Disney Irish

Premium Member
Using the handy quote feature here, please quote the sentences you find offensive or inappropriate in this thread.

Then I'll consider it.

Until then.... Jill Estorino, Disneyland Resort President, is still a woman. The previous one was a man.
As I said I'm not going to get into this with you again. We've had this discussion before multiple times when other posters brought up your fondness to focus on CM looks, which all got deleted by the MODs. So its best to stay away from this topic.

Just saying this is not the first time you've been called out for how you speak about Disney employees. So maybe something you want to think about.
 

Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.

Back
Top Bottom