Eh, that attraction's whole thing is "Do you wanna go meet Elsa? I mean, come on you know you do!" And once you do, that's pretty much the end of the experience, even though you have about half the ride left to go.Then again, Frozen Ever After at EPCOT doesn’t make much sense either nor has much happen either and it seems that’s what they used as their model, minus the Disney Jr. style writing throughout.
Prefer? No.
But I think, now that I've ridden it three times, that if the ride itself was more focused and didn't replace Splash Mountain, it wouldn't have near as much heat on it as it does.
If this opened in, say, Paris or something as a new build, people would not have cared so much about this attraction and might have even appreciated it.
I will say that while riding it, people don't always appreciate the level of wetness but don't seem to actively hate the ride.
Even if it were a new build it would still be inferior to Splash for us, similar to how we still prefer Star Tours over the Millennium Falcon ride and Toy Story Mania over the Spiderman ride. They are both enjoyable enough rides, just not as good as the older rides that are similar.So if it didn’t replace one of the most beloved Disney attractions of all time it wouldn’t be judged as harshly? Obviously. But its issues extend way past that. For starters, not doing the source material any justice at all.
At least we can pretend Millenium Falcon doesn't exist- you have to go out of your way to see it/ride it.
Tiana's looms over half of the dang park- it's an ever present reminder of Disney's 2020 DEI push.
Does anyone else remember when Tiana's was announced/built, and people were saying it was needed since Splash was poorly maintained and was unreliable, with often malfunctioning animatronics?

According to Tony, those involved in the project at WDI dismissed the suggestion as ‘nobody cares about the story of the ride, they just care about the big drop’.
Yeah.
Just let that sink in for a moment.
All the recent marketing about ‘telling stories’ means zilch.

The WDI of today is not the WDI of 30 years ago. But also, the issues with the attraction extend far beyond just the lack of tension.
I think I'm okay that Tony was excluded from the project though. It keeps his legacy intact- he isn't tarnished by being associated with the rushed retheme of one of the greatest themed attractions ever built. He already has Tomorrowland '98 on his resume, he doesn't need TBA also.

And the book….
That marvelous book he will be writing at some point…
-
Now that the dust has long since settled, is there anybody actually prefers Tiana's over Splash Mountain on non-ideological grounds?
I think this is what bothers me most. The story they came up with was at least marginally better than the lost trumpet rumor. I feel like I can overlook the plot, thin as it is. The simplistic figures, while harder to ignore, are at least more passable than the mannequins that modern Disney has used in other places.Splash had beautiful wall-to-wall sets that totally immersed you. Tiana has some beautiful sets in pockets of light.
In the body of TBA, they only have 2 songsTiana's has 5 songs, not 2? Down in New Orleans, Almost There, Going Down the Bayou, Dig a Little Deeper and Special Spice (Special Spice is reserved for the finale just like Zip A Dee Doo Dah so yeah)
Splash's facade does look like red clay hills in Georgia. If only it was moved into Liberty Square as Georgia was one of the 13 colonies and never on the "Frontier' whatsoever. I concede that salt mine explanation was one that was basically forced instead of being a natural fit but I think they did a good way of explaining that for what they could. Salt Mine was built up and became abandoned, allowing plants to return to the giant mound again. I think the front looks like a bayou tbh. I am not aware of any giant thorny bushes in the surrounding waters of a clay hill in Georgia but if you find one, feel free to let me know![]()
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.