Sirwalterraleigh
Premium Member
Did you see where I was talking about holding onto scapegoats for fantasies? This is textbook.He did give up the office once he was off the board according to the articles, or do you mean while he was no longer CEO and just on the board?
As for meddling once he was gone, not a single thing Iger did from the sidelines made Chapek commit some serious unforced errors that cost him his job. Bottom line is that no matter what Iger wanted, if Chapek had done well, he would still be there.
Not that it really matters at this point, but that is why I push back on the Iger controlled it all narrative.
One guy is responsible for all that is there. Because it took decades. The last legitimate concerns he MAY have had to keep an eye on died in 2009 and 2010. It’s been unchecked ever since. That’s not healthy for any mid sized company…let alone a behemoth.
None of these things are that hard to sniff out…you don’t need to be a billionaire to get a read on what humans do and why?