But unfortunately they still under delivered. I had high hopes now for this bigger and bolder redo. As I said in another post, I’m counting on them leaning from past mistakes.The last time a plan was redone after the initial announcement and art was New Fantasyland. Say what you will about SDMT but I think most of us can agree that it is superior to a Cinderella and Tink meet and greet.
Submitting already out of date plans isn’t completely unusual.Does anybody know when exactly this document was filed with the Florida Department of Environmental Protection?
My thought is: sure, you can submit a new document later, but if this document was just filed and the rumored changes to the plans were ordered late last year/earlier this year, why would they submit plans for review that they already know are inaccurate?
Perhaps @lazyboy97o can shed some light on the validity of my logic.
View attachment 908115
Not true. SWGE and the Epcot reimagining changed drastically from what was announced and with its concept art releasesThe last time a plan was redone after the initial announcement and art was New Fantasyland. Say what you will about SDMT but I think most of us can agree that it is superior to a Cinderella and Tink meet and greet.
Better than Tokyo and California? Tokyo probably has the best blend of modern and classic Fantasyland. The classic Fantasy Faire style is kept in pristine condition, plus they have state of the art Pooh and BatB rides.meh I persoanlly disagree. I liked what we got way more than the OG concept art. Plus I personally feel MK has the best fantasyland besides Paris, but that's just my opinion. And I only feel that way because like Paris our fantasyland has wide paths but yet still feels cosy and has a nice variety of things to do while feeling timeless
Zelda lives and dies by what game the land is based on. If it’s Ocarina of Time era, it will have some semblance of visual identity. If it’s BotW era, then it will be boring.I mean... this is exactly my point?
It's pretty generic as a setting. There's not really anything that's going to make you stand in a land and think "this is Legend of Zelda!". Just because something is popular doesn't automatically mean it's a good fit as a theme park setting.
To be clear, I'm not suggesting that means a Zelda land would be a failure or anything even remotely close to that. Just that it doesn't feel like a great property to use for a land.
I think the phase of “the process” is being overstated. There’s this assumption that since they filled in the moat they’re building like “malificents castle”…or something?Whether this reconceptualization is going to be better or worse is anyone’s guess.
Even if you’re optimistic for what this holds, it is worrisome that this late into the process some portion (or all?) of the plans have been “scrapped” after numerous levels of planning, budgeting, clearing and construction have been well underway.
So your “public” communication is… “maybe” (pure speculation) someone told some guy to leak some info and use an adjective.You have to ask @lentesta. As a well known media figure and pundit on Disney Parks and Experiences, I’m sure all sorts of people with interesting tidbits of knowledge seek him out to tell him things and he seeks others out confirm things. And who’s to say that some of those things aren’t carefully constructed responses by comms people.
I think you might be going to deep here. Nintendo world…having been to two (one of which actually works) is a hit because it just overloads you visually. The rides are meh to be honest. So the theme here overpowers the attractions. The exact oppo of abramsland…where neither works and you want to curl up and take a napZelda lives and dies by what game the land is based on. If it’s Ocarina of Time era, it will have some semblance of visual identity. If it’s BotW era, then it will be boring.
Overall I agree with you. Even in the best case scenario, I’d much rather see another Mario expansion than an entire land dedicated to Zelda.
I think the classification is based on how many times you appear on CNBC or Bloomberg to determine your weight class.Five years of leg days to get these glutes and you go with ... "pundit". SMDH.
So your “public” communication is… “maybe” (pure speculation) someone told some guy to leak some info and use an adjective.
I think you’re doing too much to cover for WDI hereSo your “public” communication is… “maybe” (pure speculation) someone told some guy to leak some info and use an adjective.
Epcot was devalued and things canceled or cheapened not replaced, ditto to GE. This appears to be a plus/replace with better, and why I went back to New Fantasyland.
My point is simply that you can make anything into a negative.I'm not sure what your point is.
Since Len is not employed by TWDC, it stands to reason that someone directly or indirectly with this project wanted this information to be made public and provided it to him.
I have no idea whether it was a comms person trying to get out ahead of a potentially embarrassing leak that the up until now approved plan was junk, or it was someone on or involved with the project that was eager to spread the word that corporate is looking to "plus" the project.
Negativity is the unfortunately natures way of counterbalancing blind faith.My point is simply that you can make anything into a negative.
I’m at fault for getting sucked in, 100% on me.
I honestly don’t get it though, why do a certain segment of people that hate everything spend so much time discussing it? I will assume you do truly enjoy something about the parks and you just don’t voice that perspective. If not, then seriously look for something else, life is short.
For me it’s politics, I can’t see the positive in anything I look at. It’s maddening to me. It is not enjoyable. So I have had to teach myself life is short, just leave it alone - I can’t control it.
Happiness and peace depend on your interpretation of events, not the events themselves.
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.