JMcMahonEsq
Well-Known Member
What do you think is more likely, a for profit company like Disney would rather destroy everything, rather than making money, or that the company that knows what it has, knows what it would cost to demo/remove things in certain ways to then try to resell/donate them knows there isn’t money to be made on it, or that it would cost more in terms of schedule cost of construction?The thing though is…how much money is Disney leaving on the table by not teaming with Sothebys or Prop Store? So much of Dinoland USA would auction for top dollar and offset a chunk of the Tropical Americas construction cost.
The Olden Gate Bridge brachiosaurus, Sue the T-Rex, the Carnotaurus and skeletons from inside Dinosaur’s rotunda room, and all the statuary from the Cretaceous Trail and the Dinosaur exterior queue would all be gladly purchased by collectors and museums across the country.
But no, Disney would much rather destroy them all.
Which seems so weird. A few years ago when NCIS New Orleans wrapped production, they had a garage sale of props. I think it was $200 and you could fill the bed of a truck with as much as you could. Everything from costumes to corpses.
Or hell, maybe it’s that the company has plans for certain items, but just doesn’t feel the need to publish them such that a bunch of uninvolved third parties don’t know what exactly is going on with an internal demo/remodling?