• The new WDWMAGIC iOS app is here!
    Stay up to date with the latest Disney news, photos, and discussions right from your iPhone. The app is free to download and gives you quick access to news articles, forums, photo galleries, park hours, weather and Lightning Lane pricing. Learn More
  • Welcome to the WDWMAGIC.COM Forums!
    Please take a look around, and feel free to sign up and join the community.

News Josh D’Amaro Named Next CEO of The Walt Disney Company

JoeCamel

Well-Known Member
I am not overly savvy when it comes to corporate finances. The quarterly earnings report included a tidbit of Disney buying back some 7 million shares. So why do that rather than retire some of their 11 billion in debt? I am sure there is an answer, could someone on this forum advise me on the why?
The simplistic answer to stock buybacks is that the board and C suite own a lot of stock, they are in contact with funds and equity firms that hold lots and lots more so buying back stock increases their holding's value directly while debt is not a bad thing to have. It allows you to be flexible in where you deploy your capital. Dumping debt will strengthen the balance sheet but the cost of the debt has to be weighed against potential returns it can generate.
The name of the game is please the stockholders and line your own pockets along the way
 

Jambo Dad

Well-Known Member
Shanghai - $5.5B
DCA re-do
2x Galaxy’s Edge ($1 billion each)
Pandora
New Fantasyland
Dream/Fantasy ($1.5 billion combined)
HKDL - $1.4B
Aulani - $800M

That is roughly $12 billion. I’m sure there are other things that add up to $30 billion… right? NextGen? DVC resorts? Do we know how much was spent on WDI research trips to Louisiana?
They were visiting the legendary salt mines of Louisiana of course.
 

Sirwalterraleigh

Premium Member
The simplistic answer to stock buybacks is that the board and C suite own a lot of stock, they are in contact with funds and equity firms that hold lots and lots more so buying back stock increases their holding's value directly while debt is not a bad thing to have. It allows you to be flexible in where you deploy your capital. Dumping debt will strengthen the balance sheet but the cost of the debt has to be weighed against potential returns it can generate.
The name of the game is please the stockholders and line your own pockets along the way
Great description…

Or if you want to go Simple: it’s cooking your books
 

JoeCamel

Well-Known Member

Dranth

Well-Known Member
I am not overly savvy when it comes to corporate finances. The quarterly earnings report included a tidbit of Disney buying back some 7 million shares. So why do that rather than retire some of their 11 billion in debt? I am sure there is an answer, could someone on this forum advise me on the why?
I am sure someone more into finance could give a better answer but, they don't have enough debt for a company of their size to be worrisome. At least currently. I also think the money they do owe was borrowed at really low rates which helps.

Personally I think they are one of the worst uses of company money, but stock buybacks benefit stock holders so tend to be popular with companies these days.
 

Jambo Dad

Well-Known Member
I am sure someone more into finance could give a better answer but, they don't have enough debt for a company of their size to be worrisome. At least currently. I also think the money they do owe was borrowed at really low rates which helps.

Personally I think they are one of the worst uses of company money, but stock buybacks benefit stock holders so tend to be popular with companies these days.
Yes it is. They can inflate their ROI without doing anything constructive.
 

JD80

Well-Known Member

1770650665735.png


Guess the park. Disneyland @mattpeto ?
 

mattpeto

Well-Known Member

View attachment 907066

Guess the park. Disneyland @mattpeto ?
Shanghai and I believe Paris will be getting new gates at some point, but I still think Disneyland Forward will be Anaheim's final opportunity for a 3rd gate and they will pull the trigger on it.
 

el_super

Well-Known Member
Disneyland will not have a third gate. There is no way to make that work financially when the second gate is still struggling when not combined with the first.
 

Charlie The Chatbox Ghost

Well-Known Member
Shanghai - $5.5B
DCA re-do
2x Galaxy’s Edge ($1 billion each)
Pandora
New Fantasyland
Dream/Fantasy ($1.5 billion combined)
HKDL - $1.4B
Aulani - $800M

That is roughly $12 billion. I’m sure there are other things that add up to $30 billion… right? NextGen? DVC resorts? Do we know how much was spent on WDI research trips to Louisiana?
I would say you'd have to account for inflation to see how that would stack up to the current 30 billion goal for WDW, but that spending is also going to be spread out over likely a decade, so I guess this is a good comparison. Though I'd imagine material and labor costs have gone up in a way that doesn't match inflation. I'm not an economist so I have no idea lol
 

TarzanForever

Active Member
Disneyland will not have a third gate. There is no way to make that work financially when the second gate is still struggling when not combined with the first.

Well that would be the case if it wasn’t already been blueprinted and sketched out. There are multiple renditions out there readily available for consumption. The 3rd gate is and will be confirmed and now we just wait to see if it’s also villians or encanto shaped but not formed.
 

Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.

Back
Top Bottom