Jeff Vahle summed up:I’m a bit ignorant… why do people dislike Vahle?
Not that I have any strong opinions on the man or anything…
Jeff Vahle summed up:I’m a bit ignorant… why do people dislike Vahle?
He got antsy after he similarly destroyed EPCOT.Don't forget he signed off on destroying the Magic Kingdom as we knew it so there is that as well....
I really don't understand the love for Vaughn. The IP mandate has been in effect both the first time he ran WDI and now as well.I feel like Disney knows it needs to pander to the Parks fans a bit. Appointing Vaughn would be an immediate home run and a huge win.
As to who would replace Vaughn at WDI - my vote would be Imagineer Daniel Joseph. He’s young and has the fire and love of the parks.
Three words. Hatbox Ghost Placement.I’m a bit ignorant… why do people dislike Vahle?
Why blame WDI for directives that clearly came from above?I really don't understand the love for Vaughn. The IP mandate has been in effect both the first time he ran WDI and now as well.
Hilarious how you’ve distilled it down to being 100% one person‘s fault. I can’t say I know the man’s work well at all, but to put some random blame solely on his shoulders is pretty ridiculous.Three words. Hatbox Ghost Placement.
The IP mandate didn’t come from Vaughn.I really don't understand the love for Vaughn. The IP mandate has been in effect both the first time he ran WDI and now as well.
Over/ under Josh “loosens” the IP mandate?
The only non-IP we’re potentially going to get is a Figment redo, which is a misnomer as it is an existing attraction and Figment is functionally its own IP already.Over/ under Josh “loosens” the IP mandate?
.5%Over/ under Josh “loosens” the IP mandate?
No but he certainly didn't fight it.The IP mandate didn’t come from Vaughn.
You have no idea if that’s true.No but he certainly didn't fight it.
Tropical Americas is a way to narratively and inorganically shoehorn two disparate IPs into DAK. It is not an example of breaking free from the IP mandate: rather, it is a clumsy way to implement it.I think it may end up being a compromise at best. And the Tropical Americas and Villians lands might be the best examples.
Tropical Americas is an original land designed by Imagineering. There is backstory being created that does not exist anywhere else, so the story of the land is unique. A resident of Pueblo Esperanza made a carousel with handcrafted animals from different movies (a slightly more creative way to integrate IP in my opinion of course). There is a town square with a fountain of all things and Mayan ruins. There will be an overarching story to this place, not entirely based off of IP. And I think that Bruce provided this direction upon his return. If we recall, D’Amaro had the blue sky parks panel at D23 in 2022. Bruce is then hired. Then at the Destination D event the following year, they presented the idea of a Tropical Americas land. I really believe Bruce gave them more direction, providing for a cohesive land instead of the ideas they were sharing the year prior.
I think that Villians Land will be similar. Will there be IP? Absolutely. Will the land and backstory be unique? For the most part I would think so.
In the end, I really think this will evolve into a marriage of the two approaches. Unless they give us a new Imagination attraction with Figment and it crushes it from a guest satisfaction perspective. They really need data to show they can be as successful with NEW original attractions. Figment could help with that.
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.