I’m surprised you even suggested “5th gate”…you know better there. There is no demand for that and it makes no economic sense on any level for Disney......
Yeah I suppose that's nothing more than wishful thinking based on a few elements I can't ignore - I mean, if I were CEO (which for obvious reasons I'm not) I'd be considering these things:
WDW is the flagship
WDW has more available land to develop and existing infrastructure to tap
WDW can draw from cruise crowd
WDW isn't taking visitors hostage at MCO
WDW could revitalize several attractive perks at minimal cost, some at substantial cost
WDW could easily establish a restore-value path
I've already got $60B that could be re-alocated with the possibility of obtaining even more but I need additional ROI to the tune of billions a year to justify that - thus the need to "go big"
I mentioned a 5th and maybe even a 6th gate at WDW. But I also mentioned a third park - as in a new, possibly mid-America theme park similar to but on a larger scale than Uni's current Frisco project - which in of itself is a stab at WDW's toddler market.
The profits are in theme parks and cruise ships. Start a theme park war and build more ships that float out of Orlando, take
prisoners tourists hostage at MCO, contain them within the parks and cruises, return them safely to MCO, all while providing an experience that makes them want to come back soon.
(Offered from the perspective of someone who took an Uber straight to Universal and didn't spend a dime at WDW the last three times I was in Orlando).