Chi84
Premium Member
I miss Fernwood Tonight.Still miss my man Craig. Last time I watched one.
I miss Fernwood Tonight.Still miss my man Craig. Last time I watched one.
...and make moneyWhat public demand? Just no contract renewal after this extension. Have some time to bring in someone actually entertaining and funny that will actually raise the ratings.
The problems is ad revenue has collapsed due to tech and society changes…Do you know why talk shows were created?
Like news they are dirt cheap to produce in the big scheme of things. Less so once celebrity became attached but the host is there to help promote whatever the guest is shilling for.
Still one of the least expensive ways to fill a couple of hours and sell ads
I have the same thought everytime a person talks about a Disney park and says “I think it’s better than ever and a great value!!”The frustrating thing about modern media is that unlike in the 60s where people had different opinions, but they were mostly looking at reality through the same basic prism. Today, and this will probably get worse when traditional television inevitably dies, everyone is basically living in their own reality, and the news is custom tailored to whatever perception of reality they personally want to believe or acknowledge.
Totally agree but I think it’s been happening for 30 years already, since the 90s we’ve had custom tailored news channels to confirm whatever we already believe, it’s just gotten worse over time.The frustrating thing about modern media is that unlike in the 60s where people had different opinions, but they were mostly looking at reality through the same basic prism. Today, and this will probably get worse when traditional television inevitably dies, everyone is basically living in their own reality, and the news is custom tailored to whatever perception of reality they personally want to believe or acknowledge.
We have really devolved as a society to the point we literally have to have two different channels of sappy movies catering to different sides of the national political divide? That is some pretty sad commentary on what our society has been reduced to and really out right depressingTotally agree but I think it’s been happening for 30 years already, since the 90s we’ve had custom tailored news channels to confirm whatever we already believe, it’s just gotten worse over time.
I think a prime example of this is the Hallmark Channel. I laugh because my GF is/was a gigantic Hallmark Channel fan, that one channel has probably accounted for 90% of her TV viewing since we started dating over a decade ago, even that specific genre has now been split into Hallmark for the more left leaning crowd and the Great American Channel for the more right leaning crowd. We have become so polarized we can’t even share a single romcom channel anymore. She still watches both but I’d say GAC probably gets 80% of her TV time now, I also laugh because I can tell which one she’s watching within minutes of sitting down because they are both that obvious in their lean.
The downfall of traditional TV will make it worse but I think it’ll be another incremental change rather than a major change, just like we’ve been experiencing for the last 3-4 decades.
It’s been a number of years I know…but are you suggesting there was anything “planned” about that?
I’ve know CMs (not frontline, office workers who worked with him daily) who worked with Josh at TDA, CMs that I trust, who vouch for Josh being a compassionate person and a good executive. I think he definitely has the potential to be a good leader. I’ve met him in person and found him to be very amiable. This was before his rise to fame 6~ years ago now. Dana has no park experience and would be a disaster on many levels. TWDC needs a leader, not a figurehead.Josh might as well just be a few more decades of Iger. Very little will change and the Company will continue to basically off itself in public perception and the IP mandate will creatively shackle WDI for years to come.
Running a pro soccer club in the U.K.What’s Eisner doing now a days?
Regardless, whoever gets the job has to give me a sense that they are not just using the playbook Iger gave them before I can really trust them with the long-term health of the company.I’ve know CMs (not frontline, office workers who worked with him daily) who worked with Josh at TDA, CMs that I trust, who vouch for Josh being a compassionate person and a good executive. I think he definitely has the potential to be a good leader. I’ve met him in person and found him to be very amiable. This was before his rise to fame 6~ years ago now. Dana has no park experience and would be a disaster on many levels. TWDC needs a leader, not a figurehead.
Running a pro soccer club in the U.K.
He didn’t actually quitThe opposite. Since it is planned this time, I wouldn’t expect it to be erratic like last time.
Back when Chapek took over, there were people in imagineering who said they missed how friendly Iger was whenever he would visit. Remember Meg Crofton? She was also said to be an extremely sweet person. Congratulations, you passed the low bar of not being mean to your subordinates, it doesn't mean you're fit to be a leader. It's a good quality to have on the side of a larger package of leadership skills. I absolutely want employees to be treated with respect and kindness by their superiors, not cruel a-holery. But it's far from the only thing that matters and isn't what is needed to turn things around.
If you don't like Iger for the way he has operated the company (which I do not), you won't like Josh either. He's not going to deviate from the status quo. I'll also be surprised if he lasts very long if he gets the job. He'll be way in over his head and also won't enjoy the same sort of clout and loyalty from the board.
The company doesn’t need someone with superficial experience in a bunch of areas. It needs someone who recognizes their edges of their experience and capacity, and can effectively delegate.I do wonder if there's a reason they didn't pull a Rasulo / Staggs switcheroo and give Josh the CFO position (especially once McCarthy left) while putting Dana at Experiences for a bit. It seems like a good way to assess Josh's capabilities and to build Dana's resume up within the company.
Based on what?Josh might as well just be a few more decades of Iger. Very little will change and the Company will continue to basically off itself in public perception and the IP mandate will creatively shackle WDI for years to come.
Same question I posed to HMF, based on what?f you don't like Iger for the way he has operated the company (which I do not), you won't like Josh either.
I mean, from what I understand, Iger sort of followed in Eisner’s shadow in order to get the job, and then ended up being very different from the leadership style of Eisner once he actually got the reins. I wonder if a part of this is the realization that you have to go through the whole drawnout process that the search committee/Iger has put in place, but with the understanding that you can do more that they actually want to do once you get in charge for real. Of course that’s all speculation, but it doesn’t seem completely unreasonable.Same question I posed to HMF, based on what?
Not trying to be combative, I just know I spent time working for people where I did not agree with many of their choices on direction or how to run the business, but went along because it was my job to carry out their ideas/plans. Sure, I would disagree (sometimes vehemently) in private, but it was their decision to make.
As soon as I was put in charge, I changed a great many things.
Anyway, it just seems odd that so many are assuming Josh won't do his own thing. Sure, he might be more of the exact same, but my point is we don't know.
According to AI -What’s Eisner doing now a days?
To quote Dame Judi Dench in the god-awful current incarnation of Spaceship Earth everyone will probably be living in a "New world custom made just for you" in the near future and it's going to make objective reality a far more complicated than it used to be to say the least because everyone will be looking at the world through their own terms.I have the same thought everytime talks abort a Disney park and says “I think it’s better than ever and a great value!!”
Now? Compared to 10 years ago? 20?
That’s like the multiverse…a reality you choose…not the Cold hard one
Echo chamber pushed by tech is a threat to everyone
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.