• The new WDWMAGIC iOS app is here!
    Stay up to date with the latest Disney news, photos, and discussions right from your iPhone. The app is free to download and gives you quick access to news articles, forums, photo galleries, park hours, weather and Lightning Lane pricing. Learn More
  • Welcome to the WDWMAGIC.COM Forums!
    Please take a look around, and feel free to sign up and join the community.

DHS Monster Inc Land Coming to Disney's Hollywood Studios

James Alucobond

Well-Known Member
You’re gonna have to speak English today…

no one has ever (or should) accuse me of paying “close attention”

So enlighten…or is this just fallout for saying you say nothing for the 1,000th straight issue?
The pattern is always the same. It's within your power to limit the amount of confusion you generate.

You frequently say something incorrect, perhaps with the intention of being overblown for effect, though I honestly have no idea what your intention is much of the time. You respond with backtracks about what you actually mean followed by hostile insults to the intelligence of respondents based on their inability to read between the lines despite providing absolutely zero subtext for them to be able to do so. You never just graciously say, "What I meant was x rather than y." You instead insult others for their lack of mind-reading ability.
 

peter11435

Well-Known Member
You’re gonna have to speak English today…

no one has ever (or should) accuse me of paying “close attention”

So enlighten…or is this just fallout for saying you say nothing for the 1,000th straight issue?
It was definitely pretty clear English.

I would hope that even if you’re not paying close attention to this thread you are at least aware of what you yourself posted.
 

MrPromey

Well-Known Member
Sorry to clarify, in the middle between those two and Comic Rewind. As in it’s longer than 60 seconds or clearly longer than Tron and RnRC.

They might eek out a little more time if it operates more in the manner of Gringots with starts/stops for story elements which for the theme would make some sense. After all, if you pass a door or two that are open, you'd have to slow down enough to actually register that.

It probably won't end up being 5 minutes like that one but maybe something more.
 

Sirwalterraleigh

Premium Member
It was definitely pretty clear English.

I would hope that even if you’re not paying close attention to this thread you are at least aware of what you yourself posted.
What claim did I make? I may (probably) have erred in some fashion. Did I say guardians didn’t fit in Epcot and marvel is a silly move in Orlando giving the contractual limitations?

Or what else was it? Wdw customers have accepted less and it dumbs down the expectations?

I think maybe the grass has already been trampled on those grounds…
 

FigmentFan82

Well-Known Member
What claim did I make? I may (probably) have erred in some fashion. Did I say guardians didn’t fit in Epcot and marvel is a silly move in Orlando giving the contractual limitations?

Or what else was it? Wdw customers have accepted less and it dumbs down the expectations?

I think maybe the grass has already been trampled on those grounds…
You wrote WDW didn’t have the rights to Guardians, which is false, they do since they are not included in the universal deal.
You also try to make it seems like GotG are still C tier characters, which after the wild success of the films, they absolutely are not anymore. To suggest otherwise is quite literally false information.
It’s fair game if you, like many, don’t like where the attraction was put, but GotG are a very popular and successful IP.
 

Sirwalterraleigh

Premium Member
The pattern is always the same. It's within your power to limit the amount of confusion you generate.
I have literally no power…my shares can’t force bob to retire or pull his sitcom head out of his can 🤷🏻‍♂️
You frequently say something incorrect, perhaps with the intention of being overblown for effect, though I honestly have no idea what your intention is much of the time.
I have zero idea what you’re talking about…that never occurred 🥸
You respond with backtracks about what you actually mean followed by hostile insults to the intelligence of respondents based on their inability to read between the lines despite providing absolutely zero subtext for them to be able to do so.
First:
1. I’m a self avowed idiot…and never have waivered from that. So you may be giving me too much “bond villain” street cred.

We waste a lot of time here. I’m just a dude that’s been around a bit…I’m not doing the “I’m really important…I just can’t tell anyone…” gag. Orlando is where the little People are…they just don’t realize. That’s been going on for decades…long before me and I’m sure Long after.
You never just graciously say, "What I meant was x rather than y." You instead insult others for their lack of mind-reading ability.
Duly noted
 

BrianLo

Well-Known Member
What claim did I make? I may (probably) have erred in some fashion.

What you said was Disney doesn’t own the rights to the Guardians of the Galaxy IP for Florida and thus there is impropriety.

What you meant was they don’t have access to the superior portions of the MCU franchise and are thus saddled with making do with the Guardians IP. As a criticism that the attraction was just desperation to access the broader franchise through the back door, because Comcast holds the real prize.

I’ll defend you that I can tell you didn’t actually intend to be incoherent or were aware that you were.
 

Sirwalterraleigh

Premium Member
You wrote WDW didn’t have the rights to Guardians, which is false, they do since they are not included in the universal deal.
You also try to make it seems like GotG are still C tier characters, which after the wild success of the films, they absolutely are not anymore. To suggest otherwise is quite literally false information.
It’s fair game if you, like many, don’t like where the attraction was put, but GotG are a very popular and successful IP.
Well that’s spelling error at most (now I’ll have to go back and look for sure?) if that is what i conveyed.

I thought (maybe wrong) that I said they don’t have the rights to core marvel IP for Florida?

And I got that crazy idea because it’s all on “marvel superhero island”…

I like guardians fine…it’s a big MCU success…but that not close to a core property for an audience.

I mean I did visit the comic book shop quite often…before everyone carried around a computer in their hands at all times…
And the cool kids read Batman and Xmen…
…and played with mud and sticks
 

Sirwalterraleigh

Premium Member
1. It’s in the wrong place
2, they let the previous attraction rot for a decade plus (how ole walt drew it up)
3. Its using an ip that they really don’t have the rights to
“Get an Uber up I-4 for Spiderman!”

You can like the ride just fine. But That changes nothing of the reality of what I just told you. Two things can be true. It’s a reach and is miscast.
Right…the ip was “marvel”…which i suppose is more a “brand” or “umbrella”

They used what they had in a park where it thematically is mismatched…from the B team

This what got the “WDI truth squad” going?

Yeah that’s on me for ambiguity.

Now we can go back to door coaster thingie?
 

Sirwalterraleigh

Premium Member
If they have some "dark ride" segments, it can be longer, of course. I can't figure out if the track layout suggests this, though. Maybe at the very beginning, when it's going from the load station to the gravity building (but that looks pretty short)?
I’m not sure if I really like the universal style start and stops (grinotts being the best example)…or don’t like them?

It allows for longer ride times…but always seem a little disjointed?

This monsters ride does present a unique opportunity for WDI to fine tune this concept…which is something they really haven’t done too much with (stateside at least)
 

HMF

Well-Known Member
Well that’s spelling error at most (now I’ll have to go back and look for sure?) if that is what i conveyed.

I thought (maybe wrong) that I said they don’t have the rights to core marvel IP for Florida?

And I got that crazy idea because it’s all on “marvel superhero island”…

I like guardians fine…it’s a big MCU success…but that not close to a core property for an audience.
I didn't even know what "Guardians Of The Galaxy" was prior to the first movie let alone think it would end up destroying DCA's Tower of Terror and Universe of Energy. Not that I am a Marvel fan anyway which I have always thought Disney owning it was a bad idea since 2009 for this exact reason.
 
Last edited:

mattpeto

Well-Known Member
The pattern is always the same. It's within your power to limit the amount of confusion you generate.

You frequently say something incorrect, perhaps with the intention of being overblown for effect, though I honestly have no idea what your intention is much of the time. You respond with backtracks about what you actually mean followed by hostile insults to the intelligence of respondents based on their inability to read between the lines despite providing absolutely zero subtext for them to be able to do so. You never just graciously say, "What I meant was x rather than y." You instead insult others for their lack of mind-reading ability.
If someone's sole purpose is to disrupt every thread with general nonsense, it's just time to utlize the ignore feature.
 

Sirwalterraleigh

Premium Member
I didn't even know what "Guardians Of The Galaxy was prior to the first movie let alone think it would end up destroying DCA's Tower of Terror and Universe of Energy. Not that I am a Marvel fan anyway which I have always thought Disney owning it was a bad idea since 2009 for this exact reason.
Nobody really did. It’s a property…just not a well known one. It was contained within the stacks of the comic book shop.

Not exactly Spider-Man
 

Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.

Back
Top Bottom