gorillaball
Well-Known Member
When did they move the Monsters Inc construction zone over to EPCOT?
I’ve seen it used mainly when we have terrible soil conditions - muddy, huge amount of groundwater etc. that persists even when we run several dewatering pumps. Allows you to cleanly install rebar, layout foundations, etc without dealing with a complete mess, risking things sinking, etc. They’re really not that crazy expensive, super thin slab just to give clean working surfaces.Thank you for the mud slab explanations, I’ve never seen anything like this on the west coast and was really confused trying to figure out why they were burying their foundation.
Is this a Florida soil/water table thing or is this pretty common around the world? First time I’ve ever seen it.
1. It’s in the wrong placeWhen the counter to "Guardians is one of the most popular rides at the whole resort" is "Well, people are stupid", I just don't tend to give their opinion the time of day.
That totally scans…high water table…sinkhole potential…etcI’ve seen it used mainly when we have terrible soil conditions - muddy, huge amount of groundwater etc. that persists even when we run several dewatering pumps. Allows you to cleanly install rebar, layout foundations, etc without dealing with a complete mess, risking things sinking, etc. They’re really not that crazy expensive, super thin slab just to give clean working surfaces.
Situation here? Not sure, but they solve several different problems
Two out of three isn’t bad1. It’s in the wrong place
2, they let the previous albumin rot for a decade plus (how ole walt drew it up)
3. Its using an ip that they really don’t have the rights to
“Get an Uber up I-4 for Soiderman!”
You can like the ride just fine. But That changes nothing of the reality of what I just told you. Two things can be true. It’s a reach and is miscast.
“Get an Uber up I-4 for Spiderman!”
Wdym they don't have the rights to Guardians?1. It’s in the wrong place
2, they let the previous attraction rot for a decade plus (how ole walt drew it up)
3. Its using an ip that they really don’t have the rights to
“Get an Uber up I-4 for Soiderman!”
You can like the ride just fine. But That changes nothing of the reality of what I just told you. Two things can be true. It’s a reach and is miscast.
My guess would be that they feel they have enough of a draw right now with new stuff from Guardians, Rat and the redo of Test Track for that park.The real problem is that Disney needed all those sponsors when Epcot first opened but today Disney is a multi-billion dollar profit company. They shouldn't allow a, done on the cheap, attraction in the park. They just don't care! They have or had a tremendous pavilion that they are letting rot away instead of making it a respectable draw thus not needing anyone to sponsor it. They needed to upgrade what they had as far as the ride. (refresh is more what I'm thinking. because I want the beginning of the ride to continue the way it originally was just technologically improved}. Put something 4D back in the theater. If they can't think of anything they shouldn't be calling themselves imagineers. Yea, I know accounts are calling all the shots now and they are thinking that they are to big to fail. Ask them what happened to Kodak due to bad decisions.
It’s a very minuscule part of the brandWdym they don't have the rights to Guardians?
…no…Please tell me this isn't an actual line in the ride?
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.