i have a pretty good idea what the popularity was for mv3d - it held its own quite well and got good scores on touring plans, etc.I do believe at the heart of it for MV3D and others is the attractions aren’t as popular as we think they are with the common guest.
"the beginning of the end" seemed to be when there was only one way in and out (vs. multiple before Star Wars construction)...the only attraction at what was otherwise considered by most guests a "dead end"i have a pretty good idea what the popularity was for mv3d - it held its own quite well and got good scores on touring plans, etc.
That doesn’t mean it was setting attendance records, but it didn’t need to.
The logic will be clearer than it's been in a while, at least. Launch Bay's removal is a step toward paring down the Star Wars sprawl; the changes to Animation Courtyard, RNRC, and Sunset Showcase move toward attractions that feel way less tonally and temporally dissonant with the Hollywood & Sunset core; and you'll now have three complete lands that deliver on the stated new direction for the park. I understand really not liking the new, more generic organizational structure that just strings together lands ripped from movies, but following the current projects, it's basically one new land and one attraction relocation away from being a more or less fully realized turnaround, which to me feels preferable to the state of something like EPCOT, where decisions seem chaotic because they're in service of a moving or elusive target.There really is no logic to the layout of DHS now. especially with Galaxy's Edge and Star Tours co-existing in completely different areas of the park.
Agreed - Launch Bay to Animation is a good move - but I wish for all that investment we were getting a family ride in that area as well.Launch Bay's removal is a step toward paring down the Star Wars sprawl; the changes to Animation Courtyard, RNRC, and Sunset Showcase move toward attractions that feel way less tonally and temporally dissonant with the Hollywood & Sunset core;
I have a book about the Florida animation studio that claims Disney's "people don't like hand-drawn animation anymore" mindset got started because Toy Story made more money than Pocahontas. Make of that what you will.You can thank the clear success of Pixar and some of DreamWorks CG films at the time for this trend, also we have to take DreamWorks’ traditionally animated films and their box office performance at the time into consideration too.
And didn't Brian claim that Steve made Kermit "too nice" or whatever? How can he be both "too nice" and an "angry, depressed victim"?How did he make Kermit a “depressed victim” if the writers at Disney are the ones in charge of that element and they have no real say or input in matters?
Isn't it kind of funny how they just so happened to have the money to get The Happytime Murders off the ground after the smear campaign against Steve? Or how they then proceeded to collaborate with Disney on a show for Disney Plus? Or how Brian performed with the Muppets again in Muppets Haunted Mansion?My big theory as to why they did what they did, outside of what I just mentioned, is due to the fact they want to stay in good standing with Disney on their decisions, despite truly being frustrated with them.
In more positive Muppets news, Rizzo and Bean have made speaking roles in recent Instagram videos, their first since Whitmire left back in 2017.
Good for him! He sounds great as both characters.Quick update to earlier, it turns out Freeman is both Rizzo and Bean now.
View attachment 898913
I like how they put Animal on one of the banners when he's not in MuppetVision 3D at all.It also resembled the aesthetic of the recent Muppet movies which started strong but fizzled out because of the weak sequel.
My take from that is that Toy Story didn't whitewash historical events. That was the problem with Pocohontas not because of how it was animated. Of course, Iger's Disney has shown us over and over again that they don't respect animation as an art form by how many live-action remakes of animated classics they have done over the last decade plus.I have a book about the Florida animation studio that claims Disney's "people don't like hand-drawn animation anymore" mindset got started because Toy Story made more money than Pocahontas. Make of that what you will.
The logic is clearer, but it still doesn't make complete sense in that it is still just a random assortment of lands and themes that largely have no connection to each other.The logic will be clearer than it's been in a while, at least. Launch Bay's removal is a step toward paring down the Star Wars sprawl; the changes to Animation Courtyard, RNRC, and Sunset Showcase move toward attractions that feel way less tonally and temporally dissonant with the Hollywood & Sunset core; and you'll now have three complete lands that deliver on the stated new direction for the park. I understand really not liking the new, more generic organizational structure that just strings together lands ripped from movies, but following the current projects, it's basically one new land and one attraction relocation away from being a more or less fully realized turnaround, which to me feels preferable to the state of something like EPCOT, where decisions seem chaotic because they're in service of a moving or elusive target.
In more positive Muppets news, Rizzo and Bean have made speaking roles in recent Instagram videos, their first since Whitmire left back in 2017. It's good to see them using the characters again after they were pretty much retired with MV3D and PizzaRizzo closing. Maybe we'll see them again for RNRC?
After hearing how close Rizzo and Bean sound to Steve, hearing Vogel Kermit again is so jarring.
He should just stick to Sweetums and Deadly as he's nearly spot on to Richard and Jerry.Yeeeah, they honestly should recast Kermit again at this point. It’s pretty clear the majority also don’t care for the current Kermit performance. As good of a performer Matt Vogel is otherwise, he just doesn’t have the right vocal range to get Kermit right and it’s def distracting. If Disney can get a character like Rizzo practically spot on, they should be able to get Kermit right by this point also.
His performances as deadly are perfection! He’s a talented performer. He’s just not good as kermit.He should just stick to Sweetums and Deadly as he's nearly spot on to Richard and Jerry.
Huh, that’s interesting. Then I wonder why he hasn’t given up the reigns on Kermit yet? Keep in mind, he’s still Big Bird, of all characters, on Sesame Street, also. And again, Uncle Deadly has been a constantly recurring character because of how well loved & praised he is. Not just for the character himself, but his performance. It’s genuinely that good.The only character of Matt's that I don't think he's very good at is Robin (apparently even he admitted he had difficulty there, which is why he gave the role to Peter Linz). In my opinion, his other Jerry Nelson characters are good.
Apparently, somebody asked Peter Linz at a convention or something why he wasn't asked to take over as Kermit, and he said that he and the other puppeteers didn't think that he was a strong enough puppeteer to lead the Muppets. I'm not sure I agree, but make of that what you will.Then I wonder why he hasn’t given up the reigns on Kermit yet?
We are the Disney. Thriftiness is futile.Disney is not the Borg. There is no singular course of action. There are an array of assorted, competing and even often contradictory views, desires and goals.
YesIs scooter and the penguins will be in the Disney's Rock n rollercoaster starring the Muppets for next year
![]()
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.